From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: "Okanovic, Haris" <harisokn@amazon.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"ankur.a.arora@oracle.com" <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"cl@gentwo.org" <cl@gentwo.org>,
"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"memxor@gmail.com" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"zhenglifeng1@huawei.com" <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
"xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com" <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
"konrad.wilk@oracle.com" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timewait()
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 15:38:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xe5sqhg.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cecbf7fb23ee83a4ce027e1be3f46f97efd585c.camel@amazon.com>
Okanovic, Haris <harisokn@amazon.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2025-08-29 at 01:07 -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This series adds waited variants of the smp_cond_load() primitives:
>> smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(), and smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait().
>>
>> Why?: as the name suggests, the new interfaces are meant for contexts
>> where you want to wait on a condition variable for a finite duration.
>> This is easy enough to do with a loop around cpu_relax(). However,
>> some architectures (ex. arm64) also allow waiting on a cacheline. So,
>> these interfaces handle a mixture of spin/wait with a smp_cond_load()
>> thrown in.
>>
>> There are two known users for these interfaces:
>>
>> - poll_idle() [1]
>> - resilient queued spinlocks [2]
>>
>> The interfaces are:
>> smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(ptr, cond_expr, time_check_expr)
>> smp_cond_load_acquire_spinwait(ptr, cond_expr, time_check_expr)
>>
>> The added parameter, time_check_expr, determines the bail out condition.
>>
>> Changelog:
>> v3 [3]:
>> - further interface simplifications (suggested by Catalin Marinas)
>>
>> v2 [4]:
>> - simplified the interface (suggested by Catalin Marinas)
>> - get rid of wait_policy, and a multitude of constants
>> - adds a slack parameter
>> This helped remove a fair amount of duplicated code duplication and in hindsight
>> unnecessary constants.
>>
>> v1 [5]:
>> - add wait_policy (coarse and fine)
>> - derive spin-count etc at runtime instead of using arbitrary
>> constants.
>>
>> Haris Okanovic had tested an earlier version of this series with
>> poll_idle()/haltpoll patches. [6]
>>
>> Any comments appreciated!
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Ankur
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241107190818.522639-3-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com/
>> [2] Uses the smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() from v1
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250627044805.945491-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com/
>> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250502085223.1316925-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com/
>> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250203214911.898276-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com/
>> [6] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f2f5d09e79539754ced085ed89865787fa668695.camel@amazon.com
>>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Ankur Arora (5):
>> asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait()
>> arm64: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait()
>> arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of
>> smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait
>> asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait()
>> rqspinlock: use smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait()
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 22 ++++++++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h | 84 +----------------------------
>> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/asm-generic/rqspinlock.h | 4 ++
>> kernel/bpf/rqspinlock.c | 25 ++++-----
>> 5 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
>
> Tested on AWS Graviton 2, 3, and 4 (ARM64 Neoverse N1, V1, and V2) with
> your V10 haltpoll changes, atop 6.17.0-rc3 (commit 07d9df8008).
> Still seeing between 1.3x and 2.5x speedups in `perf bench sched pipe`
> and `seccomp-notify`; no change in `messaging`.
Great.
> Reviewed-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>
> Tested-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>
Thank you.
--
ankur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-29 8:07 [PATCH v4 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-08-29 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 21:34 ` Ankur Arora
2025-08-29 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64: " Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 22:40 ` Ankur Arora
2025-08-29 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-29 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:47 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-29 8:07 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] rqspinlock: use smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 17:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-02 21:30 ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-02 21:31 ` Ankur Arora
2025-08-29 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timewait() Okanovic, Haris
2025-08-29 22:38 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2025-09-01 11:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 22:46 ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-03 9:27 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-03 18:34 ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-03 15:56 ` Okanovic, Haris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xe5sqhg.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).