From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 01:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xekxkjm.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f5f862e2-5ce9-4d49-970f-b480cb3e7ba2@efficios.com>
On Mon, Aug 18 2025 at 17:29, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> On 2025-08-18 16:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> That looks about right. Can you reset the branch to
>>
>> commit 85b61b265635 ("rseq: Expose stats")
>>
>> which is just adding primitive stats on top of the current mainline
>> code, and provide numbers for that too?
>>
>> That gives you 'notify: , cpuid:, fixup:' numbers, which are not 1:1
>> mappable to the final ones, but that should give some interesting
>> insight.
>
> For amd64 kernel and userspace.
>
> Before:
>
> notify: 12467
> fixup: 12467
> cpuid: 12467
>
>
> After:
>
> notify: 123669528
> fixup: 123669528
> cpuid: 123669528
That's insane compared to this:
> exit: 229294046
> signal: 11
> slowp: 4570
> ids: 615950
> cs: 2493682
> clear: 194637
> fixup: 2299044
You can assume that the number of exits (to user) is roughly the same,
i.e. ~23M, so 12M (> 50%) take the TIF_NOTIFY dance on the way out and
most of them for no good reason.
While with the rework only 4.5K go into the NOTIFY slow path and 2.5M
(10 %) do the critical section evaluation and 600k (~ 3%) update CPU/MM
CID.
No suprise that Jens is seeing this in his profiles...
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-13 16:29 [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 01/11] rseq: Avoid pointless evaluation in __rseq_notify_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 02/11] rseq: Condense the inline stubs Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 03/11] rseq: Rename rseq_syscall() to rseq_debug_syscall_exit() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-20 14:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 04/11] rseq: Replace the pointless event mask bit fiddling Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 05/11] rseq: Optimize the signal delivery path Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 06/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space further Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 07/11] entry: Cleanup header Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 17:09 ` Giorgi Tchankvetadze
2025-08-13 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 08/11] entry: Distinguish between syscall and interrupt exit Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 09/11] entry: Provide exit_to_user_notify_resume() Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 10/11] rseq: Skip fixup when returning from a syscall Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-14 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-14 13:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 16:29 ` [patch 11/11] rseq: Convert to masked user access where applicable Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 17:45 ` [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Jens Axboe
2025-08-13 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-13 21:36 ` Jens Axboe
2025-08-13 22:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-17 21:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 14:00 ` BUG: rseq selftests and librseq vs. glibc fail Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 14:15 ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 17:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 19:33 ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 19:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 19:55 ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-18 20:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-18 23:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-19 0:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-19 6:18 ` Florian Weimer
2025-08-29 18:44 ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-08-29 18:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-09-01 19:30 ` Prakash Sangappa
2025-08-18 17:38 ` [patch 00/11] rseq: Optimize exit to user space Michael Jeanson
2025-08-18 20:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-18 21:29 ` Michael Jeanson
2025-08-18 23:43 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-08-20 14:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-08-20 14:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xekxkjm.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mjeanson@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox