public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Kevin Koster <lkml@ombertech.com>
Cc: Oerg866 <oerg866@googlemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode: Consolidate the loader enablement
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:53:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xjcteq2.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408172250.GCZ_VbaqKsshMYTdaE@fat_crate.local>

On Tue, Apr 08 2025 at 19:22, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>  static struct microcode_ops	*microcode_ops;
> -bool dis_ucode_ldr = true;
> +static int dis_ucode_ldr = -1;

This tristate muck is disgusting.
  
>  bool force_minrev = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MICROCODE_LATE_FORCE_MINREV);
>  module_param(force_minrev, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
> @@ -95,11 +95,20 @@ static bool amd_check_current_patch_level(void)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static bool __init check_loader_disabled_bsp(void)
> +bool __init microcode_loader_disabled(void)
>  {
> -	static const char *__dis_opt_str = "dis_ucode_ldr";
> -	const char *cmdline = boot_command_line;
> -	const char *option  = __dis_opt_str;
> +	if (dis_ucode_ldr < 0) {
> +		if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "dis_ucode_ldr") <= 0)
> +			dis_ucode_ldr = 0;
> +		else
> +			goto disable;
> +	}

It just exists to make the above a one time operation. What's wrong with
having:

static void __init microcode_check_cmdline(void)
{
	if (cmdline_find_option_bool(boot_command_line, "dis_ucode_ldr") <= 0)
		dis_ucode_ldr = false;
}

and call that once at the proper place?

Thanks,

        tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-19  6:29 [PATCH] x86/microcode: Fix crashes on early 486 CPUs due to usage of 'cpuid' Oerg866
2024-10-19  9:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-19 14:06   ` Oerg866
2025-04-05  2:03 ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-05  9:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-05 20:33     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-05 20:50       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-05 21:03         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-06  6:40     ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-06  7:46       ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-06 19:02         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-06 23:58           ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-07 10:29             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-07 14:21               ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-07 13:55                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-07 14:28                   ` Oerg866
2025-04-08 10:37                     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-04-08 17:22                   ` [PATCH] x86/microcode: Consolidate the loader enablement Borislav Petkov
2025-04-09  7:51                     ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-10 11:53                     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-04-11 11:07                       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-14  9:59                         ` [PATCH -v2] x86/microcode: Consolidate the loader enablement checking Borislav Petkov
2025-04-14 10:48                           ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-14 11:26                             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-03 10:51                               ` David Laight
2025-04-30 19:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-02 16:22                             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-02 19:15                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-07 14:38                 ` [PATCH] x86/microcode: Fix crashes on early 486 CPUs due to usage of 'cpuid' H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-07 23:20                   ` Kevin Koster
2025-04-07 18:10                 ` David Laight
2025-04-07 14:36               ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-08 10:16           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-04-08 10:31             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-08 12:29               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-04-08 17:28                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-04-06 16:49       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-03 15:14 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/microcode: Consolidate the loader enablement checking tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov (AMD)
2025-05-04  6:14   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05  5:15     ` [PATCH] x86/microcode: Add microcode_loader_disabled() storage class for the !CONFIG_MICROCODE case Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05  5:32       ` [tip: x86/microcode] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05  7:27       ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-05-05  7:47       ` [PATCH] " Borislav Petkov
2025-05-06 10:57         ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-06 12:19           ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-06 10:44 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/microcode: Consolidate the loader enablement checking tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov (AMD)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xjcteq2.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@ombertech.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oerg866@googlemail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox