From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7A9149C7F for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 14:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712845513; cv=none; b=PplfQ1NZ33/NJvPwAIVK+TCHvh3NS7JOotkIhklAtgOtvJILtofMWk6+5ErVvjmS7G5zlbEw2G9j8/QSQauZBsrDuNlgcISEv0et2s83xxnX5P8I2pYTyK8eQ+aMayW/rKlI2NELHThgBrdevexS5mL99ObaB9gqrB1Z0ZpHnh8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712845513; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PZP5QcVK83AK5kTIbDXf89GtmzISnvQfTR1cmMBW7y4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FSguYeSAn7SsdWumImNeod+0GDNKG78gB5i9x0PaAgztvoZkr5B8mCsWVJeEnZNkYe5mim7iIxA0N3imE5ArnVFMg+54Df8RcoUPhJMi0imfY2K7c3Dp+a6qwyUK+0WqrUumU7nL2Fh0R0h9WqOivYrSa2kxolAoJkTRtODBi0Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=EJ3bs3fC; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=IxgkO6uq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="EJ3bs3fC"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="IxgkO6uq" From: Anna-Maria Behnsen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1712845510; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SEKIPLmzSrj2/vg+Hg5MOencwz/q/754oDxsJ/Tx2DI=; b=EJ3bs3fC1I/+RSvJYqb7XXQV67cp4yS8p/3KrTfLdd/pmMc5EW+iP1gZpL14yi4GTvJ2pq w9SD1TJpLKYDepgFukqrRP4iKU/eAfbla5dXalVQ88CaTQVo/8CMUGYZ2VRcTLGM9zEo4w MSKxgxkgdumZ9aOydhzQjzGCt2hgiOtZWXyV+LIpz+Jxq6ETHvDjNCw5KCeMv+bOnjZL3b SjUbVlYftfm6QCrVbtkqpaBfdcXx6bUI/SNCEcC38uuXpUcJXvRfhn7GAaQ+tsQ733oMTW kQbxSU5FP6KY3M+GUhwZ7M2RdESwWzbI5vRzw5Ta6BNcAX4gj53Cowr1wgnBZA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1712845510; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SEKIPLmzSrj2/vg+Hg5MOencwz/q/754oDxsJ/Tx2DI=; b=IxgkO6uqCPYcJmHwXfKg5lok+Rx2ZIvaovD0qUG+ioF46cvSN0ypdxn3+bck4YD1Kr5ChE osa3lk2CeEaYT1DQ== To: Thomas Gleixner , LKML Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , John Stultz , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Boyd , Eric Biederman , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/50] posix-cpu-timers: Save interval only for armed timers In-Reply-To: <20240410165551.442678509@linutronix.de> References: <20240410164558.316665885@linutronix.de> <20240410165551.442678509@linutronix.de> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:25:10 +0200 Message-ID: <875xwougc9.fsf@somnus> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Thomas Gleixner writes: > There is no point to return the interval for timers which have been > disarmed. > common_timer_get() returns/updates interval unconditionally - so behavior then differs. Thanks, Anna-Maria