From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACD7C61D92 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233537AbjKUK2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:28:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229598AbjKUK2s (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:28:48 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D840DBA for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2023 02:28:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700562524; x=1732098524; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=JdJQAgpEzO62bU5aQympYnma9KVKNc9ObKEUCoAvNPM=; b=CDj7BFTjV1mfHuhrj2o9quJMG9BBorLMBfQbQNsaWRsRiDamNrTuzyYV XkKl8SE0pMRg3O91ywZD+0L2aAg6iK+le5WBHFrHcA9r6vWtx8WoAduop JHrP01Ml+POFbxka8zdr5Rz2X7UpelIUHm9MGfC/+SG+d6OYz8k2xcpSQ 6KvPrUkgEYQCuP3h5NDzMgiiZ+pICXoo/Jc1wt/lqL8AwQIdssnyMNAG5 jKSyNpLiOJXgJC1qrbbK0p14d1E4W2HDmYD0e7H6NCbc6gxRuSvi8y/X9 glPcITgng8qrumY4cP1i+k+QUNy65VQuR2ql07PWD3Didd7U7cLFMxqWy A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10900"; a="371984825" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,215,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="371984825" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2023 02:28:43 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10900"; a="716485408" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,215,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="716485408" Received: from cdeakx-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.58.54]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Nov 2023 02:28:40 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Hans de Goede , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v4 00/16] drm/i915/dsi: 4th attempt to get rid of IOSF GPIO In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20231103201831.1037416-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871qcqqa1k.fsf@intel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 12:28:37 +0200 Message-ID: <875y1vo0x6.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Nov 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:15:03PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Hans de Goede wrote: >> > Ok, this now has been testen on both a BYT and a CHT device which >> > actually use GPIO controls in their MIPI sequences so this >> > series is: >> > >> > Tested-by: Hans de Goede >> > >> > And the code of the entire series also looks good to me: >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede >> > >> > for the series. >> >> Thanks Andy & Hans! >> >> I'll merge this once the test results are in. The BAT results have been >> a bit flaky recently, so needed to do a rerun. >> >> That said, I'm not sure if we have any hardware in CI that would >> actually exercise the modifications, so in that sense I trust Hans' >> testing much more. > > Thank you! > Should I fix checkpatch warnings CI reported about? Nah, they're benign. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel