From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Kyle Huey" <me@kylehuey.com>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Collingbourne" <pcc@google.com>,
"Alexey Gladkov" <legion@kernel.org>,
"Robert O'Callahan" <rocallahan@gmail.com>,
"Marko Mäkelä" <marko.makela@mariadb.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Al Viro" <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] signal: In get_signal test for signal_group_exit every time through the loop
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:32:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yssekcd.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bl2kekig.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2021 23:29:11 -0600")
Recently while investigating a problem with rr and signals I noticed
that siglock is dropped in ptrace_signal and get_signal does not jump
to relock.
Looking farther to see if the problem is anywhere else I see that
do_signal_stop also returns if signal_group_exit is true. I believe
that test can now never be true, but it is a bit hard to trace
through and be certain.
Testing signal_group_exit is not expensive, so move the test for
signal_group_exit into the for loop inside of get_signal to ensure
the test is never skipped improperly.
This has been a potential since I added the test for signal_group_exit
was added.
Fixes: 35634ffa1751 ("signal: Always notice exiting tasks")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 7c4b7ae714d4..986fa69c15c5 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2662,19 +2662,19 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
goto relock;
}
- /* Has this task already been marked for death? */
- if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
- ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
- sigdelset(¤t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
- trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO,
- &sighand->action[SIGKILL - 1]);
- recalc_sigpending();
- goto fatal;
- }
-
for (;;) {
struct k_sigaction *ka;
+ /* Has this task already been marked for death? */
+ if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
+ ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
+ sigdelset(¤t->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
+ trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO,
+ &sighand->action[SIGKILL - 1]);
+ recalc_sigpending();
+ goto fatal;
+ }
+
if (unlikely(current->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_PENDING) &&
do_signal_stop(0))
goto relock;
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 3:41 [PATCH] signal: SIGKILL can cause signal effects to appear at PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT without tracer notification Kyle Huey
2021-11-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] signal: factor out SIGKILL generation in get_signal Kyle Huey
2021-11-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] signal: after notifying a ptracer of a signal, recheck for pending SIGKILLs Kyle Huey
2021-11-02 14:08 ` [PATCH] signal: SIGKILL can cause signal effects to appear at PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT without tracer notification Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-02 16:01 ` Kyle Huey
2021-11-02 18:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-02 19:09 ` Kyle Huey
2021-11-08 23:58 ` Kyle Huey
2021-11-14 17:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-16 5:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] signal: requeuing undeliverable signals Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-16 5:32 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-11-16 18:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: In get_signal test for signal_group_exit every time through the loop Kees Cook
2021-11-17 16:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-16 5:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] signal: Requeue signals in the appropriate queue Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-16 18:30 ` Kees Cook
2021-11-17 16:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-16 5:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] signal: Requeue ptrace signals Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-16 18:31 ` Kees Cook
2021-11-17 16:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-17 16:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] signal: requeuing undeliverable signals Kyle Huey
2021-11-17 16:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-18 6:12 ` Marko Mäkelä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875yssekcd.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marko.makela@mariadb.com \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rocallahan@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox