From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] log2: make is_power_of_2() integer constant expression when possible
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:16:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875zszndwd.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301122659.1776b678fadcc16c1fb2ab61@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 01 Mar 2019, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 14:52:07 +0200 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> While is_power_of_2() is an inline function and likely gets optimized
>> for compile time constant arguments, it still doesn't produce an integer
>> constant expression that could be used in, say, static data
>> initialization or case labels.
>
> hm, what code wants to do these things?
>
>> Make is_power_of_2() an integer constant expression when possible,
>> otherwise using the inline function to avoid multiple evaluation of the
>> parameter.
>
> Spose so. But I fear that some gcc versions will get it right and
> others will mess it up. While this patch is under test I think it
> would be best to also have at least one or two callsites which actually
> use the compile-time evaluation feature. Possible?
I have some drm/i915 patches that have a local compile-time version of
IS_POWER_OF_2(). It'll take a while before they hit Linus' master. This
can wait.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-04 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-01 12:52 [PATCH] log2: make is_power_of_2() integer constant expression when possible Jani Nikula
2019-03-01 13:07 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-01 20:26 ` Andrew Morton
2019-03-04 10:16 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
[not found] ` <201903041956.eLAFVhUK%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2019-03-04 11:47 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875zszndwd.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox