From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751591AbdJRUnO (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:43:14 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:47100 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141AbdJRUnM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:43:12 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,398,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="162069591" From: Andi Kleen To: Srividya Desireddy Cc: "sjenning\@redhat.com" , "ddstreet\@ieee.org" , "linux-mm\@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "penberg\@kernel.org" , Dinakar Reddy Pathireddy , SHARAN ALLUR , RAJIB BASU , JUHUN KIM , "srividya.desireddy\@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] zswap: Same-filled pages handling References: <20171018104832epcms5p1b2232e2236258de3d03d1344dde9fce0@epcms5p1> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:43:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20171018104832epcms5p1b2232e2236258de3d03d1344dde9fce0@epcms5p1> (Srividya Desireddy's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:48:32 +0000") Message-ID: <8760bci3vl.fsf@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Srividya Desireddy writes: > > On a ARM Quad Core 32-bit device with 1.5GB RAM by launching and > relaunching different applications, out of ~64000 pages stored in > zswap, ~11000 pages were same-value filled pages (including zero-filled > pages) and ~9000 pages were zero-filled pages. What are the values for the non zero cases? > +static int zswap_is_page_same_filled(void *ptr, unsigned long *value) > +{ > + unsigned int pos; > + unsigned long *page; > + > + page = (unsigned long *)ptr; > + for (pos = 1; pos < PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(*page); pos++) { > + if (page[pos] != page[0]) > + return 0; > + } So on 32bit it checks for 32bit repeating values and on 64bit for 64bit repeating values. Does that make sense? Did you test the patch on a 64bit system? Overall I would expect this extra pass to be fairly expensive. It may be better to add some special check to the compressor, and let it abort if it sees a string of same values, and only do the check then. -Andi