From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: Widen vblank count to 64 bits. Change vblank time precision to ns
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:54:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760egutih.fsf@keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170707121640.4oedsdmpwhi4neyj@phenom.ffwll.local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> writes:
> I'd drop that part (but keep 64 everywhere else ofc).
Yeah, we only ever ask drivers for a delta anyways, so keeping an
internal 64-bit value while retaining the 32-bit driver API is
easy to manage.
>> > Other thought on this, since you bother to change all the types: Afaik
>> > both timespec and timeval suffer from the 32bit issues.
>>
>> I'm not sure what 32bit issues you're concerned about here? We don't
>> compare these values, just report them up to user space.
>
> Year 2038 32bit wrap-around bug. Yes I believe/fear drm will still be
> around then :-)
A fine point. I've switched to ktime_t, which has additional benefits in
making the internal interfaces a bit cleaner with pass-by-value possible
in more cases now.
I've pushed incremental patches out for all of the suggested changes to
my drm-sequence-64 branch. I think I'll send those out as incremental
patches and then also send out a squashed version from the original
branch point.
--
-keith
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 22:10 [PATCH 0/3] drm: Add CRTC-id based ioctls for vblank query/event Keith Packard
2017-07-05 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: Widen vblank count to 64 bits. Change vblank time precision to ns Keith Packard
2017-07-06 7:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 14:59 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-07 12:16 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-25 20:54 ` Keith Packard [this message]
2017-07-06 7:45 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-07-06 8:05 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-07-06 15:11 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-06 15:04 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-07 1:34 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-07-07 2:05 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-07-05 22:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm: Reorganize drm_pending_event to support future event types Keith Packard
2017-07-06 7:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 15:36 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-07 12:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-05 22:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm: Add CRTC_GET_SEQUENCE and CRTC_QUEUE_SEQUENCE ioctls Keith Packard
2017-07-06 7:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 10:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-07-06 11:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-07-06 14:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-07-06 16:28 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-06 17:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-07-06 18:22 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-06 18:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-07-06 19:46 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-06 16:27 ` Keith Packard
2017-07-06 21:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-01 5:03 ` [PATCH 0/3] drm: Add CRTC-id based ioctls for vblank query/event Keith Packard
2017-08-01 5:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: Widen vblank UAPI to 64 bits. Change vblank time to ktime_t [v2] Keith Packard
2017-08-02 8:53 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-02 9:41 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-08-06 17:35 ` Keith Packard
2017-08-01 5:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm: Reorganize drm_pending_event to support future event types [v2] Keith Packard
2017-08-02 9:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-01 5:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm: Add CRTC_GET_SEQUENCE and CRTC_QUEUE_SEQUENCE ioctls [v2] Keith Packard
2017-08-02 9:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-06 3:32 ` Keith Packard
2017-08-07 3:02 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-08-07 8:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-09 17:18 ` Keith Packard
2017-10-10 8:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-08-02 9:45 ` Michel Dänzer
2017-08-06 3:42 ` Keith Packard
2017-08-07 3:03 ` Michel Dänzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8760egutih.fsf@keithp.com \
--to=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).