From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, nico@fluxnic.net,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment workaround
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:12:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8760ov7938.fsf@belgarion.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013.095012.244532868281403236.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:50:12 -0400 (EDT)")
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 22:33:45 +0200
>
>> Writes to u16 has a special handling on 3 PXA platforms, where the
>> hardware wiring forces these writes to be u32 aligned.
>>
>> This patch isolates this handling for PXA platforms as before, but
>> enables this "workaround" to be set up dynamically, which will be the
>> case in device-tree build types.
>>
>> This patch was tested on 2 PXA platforms : mainstone, which relies on
>> the workaround, and lubbock, which doesn't.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
>
> Please resubmit this patch series:
>
> 1) Respun against net-next, these don't currently apply cleanly there.
>
> 2) With a proper "[PATCH 0/3] ..." posting explaining at a high level
> what this patch series does, how it does it, and why it does it
> that way.
Sure, let me retest it after the rebase, and I'll post again.
Cheers.
--
Robert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-14 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-09 20:33 [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment workaround Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net: smc91x: take into account half-word workaround Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] net: smsc91x: add u16 workaround for pxa platforms Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-09 21:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment workaround Andy Shevchenko
2016-10-10 6:30 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-13 13:50 ` David Miller
2016-10-14 6:12 ` Robert Jarzmik [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-15 19:27 [PATCH v2 0/3] support smc91x on mainstone and devicetree Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-15 19:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment workaround Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-15 21:11 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-10-16 10:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8760ov7938.fsf@belgarion.home \
--to=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox