public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: systemd-udevd/497
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:47:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761m7lm3j.fsf@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1404160958440.9704@gentwo.org> (Christoph Lameter's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:03:23 -0500 (CDT)")

Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> writes:

> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:55:50 +0100 Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com> wrote:
>>
>> > (Cc'ing both lis3lv02d and ACPI maintainers)
>> >
>> > Since commit 188a81409ff7de1c5aae947a96356ddd8ff4aaa3 ("percpu: add
>> > preemption checks to __this_cpu ops") I've been seeing the following:
>> >
>> > [   10.485588] hp_accel: hardware type HPB64xx found
>> > [   10.485772] BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: systemd-udevd/497
>> > [   10.485777] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>> > [   10.485781] CPU: 3 PID: 497 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G        W     3.15.0-rc1 #9
>> > [   10.485783] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8470p/179B, BIOS 68ICF Ver. F.02 04/27/2012
>> > [   10.485785]  ffffffff81a14db5 ffff88022c80b8e0 ffffffff81604ba4 0000000000000003
>> > [   10.485789]  ffff88022c80b908 ffffffff81313431 0000000000000000 0000000000000032
>> > [   10.485793]  00000000000003e8 ffff88022c80b918 ffffffff81313473 ffff88022c80b928
>> > [   10.485796] Call Trace:
>> > [   10.485802]  [<ffffffff81604ba4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x7a
>> > [   10.485805]  [<ffffffff81313431>] check_preemption_disabled+0xe1/0xf0
>> > [   10.485808]  [<ffffffff81313473>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
>> > [   10.485813]  [<ffffffff810e4eb8>] touch_nmi_watchdog+0x28/0x40
>>
>> Presumably touch_softlockup_watchdog() being called with preemption
>> enabled.  Which is a legitimate thing to do and there's no point in
>> disabling preemption just to squish a runtime warning.
>>
>> Christoph, this thing has iirc caught a couple of very minor bugs but
>> it is being quite a pain in the rear.   I'm inclined to revert?
>
> Well this preemption check functionality was strongly desired by Peter
> Zilkstra and Ingo Molnar and made a precondition for more extensive use of
> the this_cpu operations. My patches to various subsystems were rejected
> because these operations were deemed unsafe without those checks.
>
> The simple thing to do in these cases is to use switch from __this_cpu_*
> to raw_cpu ops to squish these warnings.

FWIW, I just gave the -mm tree patch
kernel-watchdogc-touch_softlockup_watchdog-use-raw_cpu_write.patch [1]
a try and it looks like it fixes this issue.

[1] http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/kernel-watchdogc-touch_softlockup_watchdog-use-raw_cpu_write.patch

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

      reply	other threads:[~2014-04-17 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 23:55 BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: systemd-udevd/497 Luis Henriques
2014-04-15 21:22 ` Éric Piel
2014-04-15 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2014-04-16 15:03   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-04-17 20:47     ` Luis Henriques [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8761m7lm3j.fsf@canonical.com \
    --to=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox