public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Split wait_noreap_copyout()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 16:35:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8763fuwmk6.wl%vmayatsk@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090521141250.GC14149@redhat.com>

At Thu, 21 May 2009 16:12:50 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Roland thinks that "-EFAULT -> success" change is acceptable, and I think
> the same. So, to me the best option is just  change the changelog of this
> patch and that is all.
> 
> Or. We can make a trivial patch which adds the behavior change first:
> 
> 	Changelog: always accept the NULL infop, because it is not
> 	possible to understand the current behaviour ;)
> 
> 	User-visible change! needs Acks!
> 
> 	--- a/kernel/exit.c
> 	+++ b/kernel/exit.c
> 	@@ -1126,24 +1126,26 @@ static int eligible_child(struct wait_op
> 	 static int wait_noreap_copyout(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p,
> 					pid_t pid, uid_t uid, int why, int status)
> 	 {
> 	-	struct siginfo __user *infop;
> 		int retval = wo->wo_rusage
> 			? getrusage(p, RUSAGE_BOTH, wo->wo_rusage) : 0;
> 	-
> 		put_task_struct(p);
> 	-	infop = wo->wo_info;
> 	-	if (!retval)
> 	-		retval = put_user(SIGCHLD, &infop->si_signo);
> 	-	if (!retval)
> 	-		retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
> 	-	if (!retval)
> 	-		retval = put_user((short)why, &infop->si_code);
> 	-	if (!retval)
> 	-		retval = put_user(pid, &infop->si_pid);
> 	-	if (!retval)
> 	-		retval = put_user(uid, &infop->si_uid);
> 	-	if (!retval)
> 	-		retval = put_user(status, &infop->si_status);
> 	+
> 	+	if (wo->wo_info) {
> 	+		struct siginfo __user *infop = wo->wo_info;
> 	+
> 	+		if (!retval)
> 	+			retval = put_user(SIGCHLD, &infop->si_signo);
> 	+		if (!retval)
> 	+			retval = put_user(0, &infop->si_errno);
> 	+		if (!retval)
> 	+			retval = put_user((short)why, &infop->si_code);
> 	+		if (!retval)
> 	+			retval = put_user(pid, &infop->si_pid);
> 	+		if (!retval)
> 	+			retval = put_user(uid, &infop->si_uid);
> 	+		if (!retval)
> 	+			retval = put_user(status, &infop->si_status);
> 	+	}
> 		if (!retval)
> 			retval = pid;
> 		return retval;
> 
> And then redo Vitaly's patches on top of this change.
> 
> What do you and Vitaly think?

I like your idea.

-- 
wbr, Vitaly

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-21 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-11 13:25 [PATCH 0/5] wait_task_* cleanups V2 Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] Split wait_noreap_copyout() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 23:45   ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-20 15:21   ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-20 15:57     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-20 20:29       ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-20 18:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-21 14:12       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-21 14:35         ` Vitaly Mayatskikh [this message]
2009-06-09 15:14   ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 13:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] Use copy_wait_opts_to_user() in wait_task_stopped() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 13:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] Use copy_wait_opts_to_user() in do_wait() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-06-15 16:39   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-11 13:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] Use copy_wait_opts_to_user() in wait_task_zombie() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-06-15 16:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-11 13:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] Use copy_wait_opts_to_user() in wait_task_continued() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-06-15 16:55   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-15 17:13     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-06-15 17:16     ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-12  3:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] wait_task_* cleanups V2 Roland McGrath
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-11 10:12 [PATCH 0/5] wait_task_* cleanups Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] Split wait_noreap_copyout() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 10:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 11:20     ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 12:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-11 12:17     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 20:47       ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2009-05-11 21:04         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-11 12:17     ` Vitaly Mayatskikh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8763fuwmk6.wl%vmayatsk@redhat.com \
    --to=v.mayatskih@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox