From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:32:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:32:19 -0500 Received: from cygnus-ext.enyo.de ([212.9.189.162]:10501 "EHLO mail.enyo.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:32:02 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Release of 2.4.21 From: Florian Weimer Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:43:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030320203015$4839@gated-at.bofh.it> (krause@sdbk.de's message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:30:15 +0100") Message-ID: <8765qdg46i.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) References: <20030320200019$6ddc@gated-at.bofh.it> <20030320203015$4839@gated-at.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org krause@sdbk.de (Sebastian D.B. Krause) writes: > I think the best way is to release a 2.4.21 kernel with only the > most important fixes (e.g. ptrace, ext3) and no new features. You can do this on your own. So what? Releasing an official 2.4.21 with some fixes (and no new features) is just a PR issue. I've already seen people comparing the alleged IIS bug (or this new IE hole) and the ptrace() bug...