public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/6] misc: sram: implement reserved sram areas
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:46:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8769537.NUv9SMRkyo@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21117503.1c6iOkvYSr@phil>

This implements support for defining reserved areas as subnodes,
to keep the genpool from using these.

Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Ulrich Prinz <ulrich.prinz@googlemail.com>
---
 drivers/misc/sram.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
index afe66571..674b0cd 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/list_sort.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
@@ -36,14 +39,35 @@ struct sram_dev {
 	struct clk *clk;
 };
 
+struct sram_reserve {
+	struct list_head list;
+	u32 start;
+	u32 size;
+};
+
+static int sram_reserve_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a,
+					struct list_head *b)
+{
+	struct sram_reserve *ra = list_entry(a, struct sram_reserve, list);
+	struct sram_reserve *rb = list_entry(b, struct sram_reserve, list);
+
+	return ra->start - rb->start;
+}
+
 static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	void __iomem *virt_base;
 	struct sram_dev *sram;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned long size;
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *child;
+	unsigned long size, cur_start, cur_size;
+	struct sram_reserve *rblocks, *block;
+	struct list_head reserve_list;
+	unsigned int nblocks;
 	int ret;
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&reserve_list);
+
 	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	virt_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
 	if (IS_ERR(virt_base))
@@ -65,19 +89,106 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!sram->pool)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool, (unsigned long)virt_base,
-				res->start, size, -1);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		if (sram->clk)
-			clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
-		return ret;
+	/*
+	 * We need an additional block to mark the end of the memory region
+	 * after the reserved blocks from the dt are processed.
+	 */
+	nblocks = (np) ? of_get_available_child_count(np) + 1 : 1;
+	rblocks = kmalloc((nblocks) * sizeof(*rblocks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rblocks) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_alloc;
 	}
 
+	block = &rblocks[0];
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+		struct resource child_res;
+
+		ret = of_address_to_resource(child, 0, &child_res);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+				"could not get address for node %s\n",
+				child->full_name);
+			goto err_chunks;
+		}
+
+		if (child_res.start < res->start || child_res.end > res->end) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+				"reserved block %s outside the sram area\n",
+				child->full_name);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_chunks;
+		}
+
+		block->start = child_res.start - res->start;
+		block->size = resource_size(&child_res);
+		list_add_tail(&block->list, &reserve_list);
+
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found reserved block 0x%x-0x%x\n",
+			block->start,
+			block->start + block->size);
+
+		block++;
+	}
+
+	/* the last chunk marks the end of the region */
+	rblocks[nblocks - 1].start = size;
+	rblocks[nblocks - 1].size = 0;
+	list_add_tail(&rblocks[nblocks - 1].list, &reserve_list);
+
+	list_sort(NULL, &reserve_list, sram_reserve_cmp);
+
+	cur_start = 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(block, &reserve_list, list) {
+		/* can only happen if sections overlap */
+		if (block->start < cur_start) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+				"block at 0x%x starts after current offset 0x%lx\n",
+				block->start, cur_start);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto err_chunks;
+		}
+
+		/* current start is in a reserved block, so continue after it */
+		if (block->start == cur_start) {
+			cur_start = block->start + block->size;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/*
+		 * allocate the space between the current starting
+		 * address and the following reserved block, or the
+		 * end of the region.
+		 */
+		cur_size = block->start - cur_start;
+
+		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",
+			cur_start, cur_start + cur_size);
+		ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool,
+				(unsigned long)virt_base + cur_start,
+				res->start + cur_start, cur_size, -1);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			goto err_chunks;
+
+		/* next allocation after this reserved block */
+		cur_start = block->start + block->size;
+	}
+
+	kfree(rblocks);
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sram);
 
 	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "SRAM pool: %ld KiB @ 0x%p\n", size / 1024, virt_base);
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_chunks:
+	kfree(rblocks);
+err_alloc:
+	if (sram->clk)
+		clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int sram_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
1.8.5.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-25 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-25 11:44 [PATCH v8 0/6] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:45 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 13:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-26 22:02     ` [PATCH v8.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-02-27 19:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-25 11:46 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2014-03-03 11:29   ` [PATCH v8 2/6] misc: sram: implement reserved sram areas Philipp Zabel
2014-02-25 11:47 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] ARM: rockchip: add snoop-control-unit Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:47 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] ARM: rockchip: add sram dt nodes and documentation Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] ARM: rockchip: add power-management-unit Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] ARM: rockchip: add smp bringup code Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8769537.NUv9SMRkyo@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox