From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH v8 2/6] misc: sram: implement reserved sram areas
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:46:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8769537.NUv9SMRkyo@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21117503.1c6iOkvYSr@phil>
This implements support for defining reserved areas as subnodes,
to keep the genpool from using these.
Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Ulrich Prinz <ulrich.prinz@googlemail.com>
---
drivers/misc/sram.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
index afe66571..674b0cd 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
@@ -36,14 +39,35 @@ struct sram_dev {
struct clk *clk;
};
+struct sram_reserve {
+ struct list_head list;
+ u32 start;
+ u32 size;
+};
+
+static int sram_reserve_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a,
+ struct list_head *b)
+{
+ struct sram_reserve *ra = list_entry(a, struct sram_reserve, list);
+ struct sram_reserve *rb = list_entry(b, struct sram_reserve, list);
+
+ return ra->start - rb->start;
+}
+
static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
void __iomem *virt_base;
struct sram_dev *sram;
struct resource *res;
- unsigned long size;
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *child;
+ unsigned long size, cur_start, cur_size;
+ struct sram_reserve *rblocks, *block;
+ struct list_head reserve_list;
+ unsigned int nblocks;
int ret;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&reserve_list);
+
res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
virt_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
if (IS_ERR(virt_base))
@@ -65,19 +89,106 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!sram->pool)
return -ENOMEM;
- ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool, (unsigned long)virt_base,
- res->start, size, -1);
- if (ret < 0) {
- if (sram->clk)
- clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * We need an additional block to mark the end of the memory region
+ * after the reserved blocks from the dt are processed.
+ */
+ nblocks = (np) ? of_get_available_child_count(np) + 1 : 1;
+ rblocks = kmalloc((nblocks) * sizeof(*rblocks), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rblocks) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_alloc;
}
+ block = &rblocks[0];
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+ struct resource child_res;
+
+ ret = of_address_to_resource(child, 0, &child_res);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "could not get address for node %s\n",
+ child->full_name);
+ goto err_chunks;
+ }
+
+ if (child_res.start < res->start || child_res.end > res->end) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "reserved block %s outside the sram area\n",
+ child->full_name);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_chunks;
+ }
+
+ block->start = child_res.start - res->start;
+ block->size = resource_size(&child_res);
+ list_add_tail(&block->list, &reserve_list);
+
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found reserved block 0x%x-0x%x\n",
+ block->start,
+ block->start + block->size);
+
+ block++;
+ }
+
+ /* the last chunk marks the end of the region */
+ rblocks[nblocks - 1].start = size;
+ rblocks[nblocks - 1].size = 0;
+ list_add_tail(&rblocks[nblocks - 1].list, &reserve_list);
+
+ list_sort(NULL, &reserve_list, sram_reserve_cmp);
+
+ cur_start = 0;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(block, &reserve_list, list) {
+ /* can only happen if sections overlap */
+ if (block->start < cur_start) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev,
+ "block at 0x%x starts after current offset 0x%lx\n",
+ block->start, cur_start);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err_chunks;
+ }
+
+ /* current start is in a reserved block, so continue after it */
+ if (block->start == cur_start) {
+ cur_start = block->start + block->size;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * allocate the space between the current starting
+ * address and the following reserved block, or the
+ * end of the region.
+ */
+ cur_size = block->start - cur_start;
+
+ dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",
+ cur_start, cur_start + cur_size);
+ ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool,
+ (unsigned long)virt_base + cur_start,
+ res->start + cur_start, cur_size, -1);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_chunks;
+
+ /* next allocation after this reserved block */
+ cur_start = block->start + block->size;
+ }
+
+ kfree(rblocks);
+
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sram);
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "SRAM pool: %ld KiB @ 0x%p\n", size / 1024, virt_base);
return 0;
+
+err_chunks:
+ kfree(rblocks);
+err_alloc:
+ if (sram->clk)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
+ return ret;
}
static int sram_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
1.8.5.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-25 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-25 11:44 [PATCH v8 0/6] ARM: rockchip: add smp functionality Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:45 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: sram: describe option to reserve parts of the memory Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-26 22:02 ` [PATCH v8.1 " Heiko Stübner
2014-02-27 19:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-25 11:46 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2014-03-03 11:29 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] misc: sram: implement reserved sram areas Philipp Zabel
2014-02-25 11:47 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] ARM: rockchip: add snoop-control-unit Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:47 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] ARM: rockchip: add sram dt nodes and documentation Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] ARM: rockchip: add power-management-unit Heiko Stübner
2014-02-25 11:48 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] ARM: rockchip: add smp bringup code Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8769537.NUv9SMRkyo@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=arm@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox