Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: iio: light: ltr501: Add ltr329 compatible

[Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>]

"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org> writes:

> On Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:39:45 +0000
> Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, August 14th, 2026 at 08:18, Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Monday, August 10th, 2026 at 17:50, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 09:11:13AM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> > > > LTR-329ALS-01 is an ambient light sensor similar to LTR-303ALS-01, but
>> > > > without interrupt support.
>> > > >
>> > > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> > > > Acked-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
>> > > > ---
>> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/liteon,ltr501.yaml | 1 +
>> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> > >
>> > > sashiko issue should be addressed.
>> >
>> > What about the suggestion about adding `proximity-near-level: false` to the condition. I am thinking something like this is more correct
>> >
>> > properties:
>> >   proximity-near-level: false
>> >
>> > allOf:
>> >   - if:
>> >       properties:
>> >         compatible:
>> >           contains:
>> >             enum:
>> >               - liteon,ltr501
>> >               - liteon,ltr559
>> >     then:
>> >       properties:
>> >         proximity-near-level: true
>> >
>> > As it is only valid for those two chips, and it seems more logical to do a white-list than the opposite.
>>
>> I hope it is okay to do this change in a follow-up series to this one, so we can get it merged sooner rather than later.
>
> Whilst this looks to be in a good state to merge, timing is such that
> it is next cycle material anyway at this point unfortunately.
> So if you don't mind tidying this up as part of your series, I'd
> definitely prefer that.

I will try to do that then.

I will be away in the next 7-8 days, so will not have a good way to
actually test any additional changes requested in that period.

/Esben