From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD19939FCCA for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782292813; cv=none; b=bPnRaBsMFy5ZkTj8yGyconltXmWc3jrwImK2+Je4hWtjq61KSlHnr7c97b8iia8qmZQobi8Fi3RkwZdwuoreUBtCTzKfSrRTAD1wRtgoj5xNjWW4fF4+pN6DJhT7MZSlZdv9tYuVi3CpKzb/CCGslsIArCS/aSSt7b7iMsxe4I0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782292813; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6Sjg9a/yYPaHx8kiHlUlMqcvDDNQf4+yPxsHM7ljJcE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=q6hqsb5vNGSLXUlwwl6cgBUBaoFdv7Y2p3lKuxGA4nP0FdYJI/P+XIioonJXiAqREGC48p2NONYklWlIx11bjVEYpMX+1m8jRnZugjIYQNYcigl44eU2FyjKcaS2PI9IZfqr6wK2WSDIhzk8xgW84EAnEPLM88EE3AgHILZC9to= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GQEdeO4e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GQEdeO4e" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C5391F00A3A; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:20:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782292806; bh=vnLn/NysT/oJGPt58vQkpWbudG6WJXU9Tq4Mi1vUv0s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=GQEdeO4eRRp75i/bhcJLI/T99KditvWrLKHLJ19SoO/Gcplb22e2kkUDAgsgDh+QD Qd7bKntNQA8B5Dqo0JOw0erFk/SDxPv8yopbjyC4wmOcRA6a0rG3StjjP+zH/8UkM6 PVuTkwRFWkDZB8sQMrfeMDc6vyL7ohrZvLuabBriQMbrOk1svP6aSK4+boNGEIdbBr 1SvxdxmSU9TElm3Jq8ThVuogcykC5R+uLjtsqCdpZdZiuFHjD4QqT6mgVPpV0LIrmw e1T7v2UE+9KwJp398dT3N8ruexfWunehqDaz8DKiZEYmOS3ACS9cJeMl9xpNKXSU3S eP+hiWVSIPkhQ== From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" , LKML Cc: Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: debugobject: Make it work with deferred page initialization - again In-Reply-To: References: <87pl6gznti.ffs@tglx> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:20:02 +0200 Message-ID: <877bnol2gt.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jun 23 2026 at 22:50, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 2/7/26 14:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> In preemptible context the reclaim bit is harmless and not a performance >> issue as that's usually invoked from slow path initialization context. >> >> That makes debugobjects depend on PREEMPT_COUNT || !DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. >> >> Fixes: af92793e52c3 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_nolock() and kfree_nolock().") >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > > FYI, it should now be possible to revert this workaround: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=335c347686e76df9d2c7d7f61b5ea627a4c5cb4c Cool.