From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
peterz@infradead.org, kees@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org,
linusw@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
david.kaplan@amd.com, lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, timothy.hayes@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com, oupton@kernel.org,
yeoreum.yun@arm.com, miko.lenczewski@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
kevin.brodsky@arm.com, james.clark@linaro.org, tabba@google.com,
mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com, arnd@arndb.de,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] arm64: Add HOTPLUG_PARALLEL support for secondary CPUs
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 17:49:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bnvdf1a.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611133809.3854977-4-ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jun 11 2026 at 21:38, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ config ARM64
> select CPUMASK_OFFSTACK if NR_CPUS > 256
> select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
> select HAVE_EXTRA_IPI_TRACEPOINTS
> + select HOTPLUG_PARALLEL if SMP && HOTPLUG_CPU
Why do you tie that to HOTPLUG_CPU? HOTPLUG_CPU lets you unplug/plug
CPUs at runtime, but if its disabled then a SMP system still has to
bring up the APs. So why should that fall back to the existing variant?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PARALLEL
> +extern struct secondary_data cpu_boot_data[NR_CPUS];
> +#endif
> +
> extern struct secondary_data secondary_data;
> extern long __early_cpu_boot_status;
> extern void secondary_entry(void);
> @@ -124,7 +128,11 @@ static inline void __noreturn cpu_park_loop(void)
>
> static inline void update_cpu_boot_status(unsigned int cpu, int val)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PARALLEL
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpu_boot_data[cpu].status, val);
> +#else
> WRITE_ONCE(secondary_data.status, val);
> +#endif
You're really a great fan of #ifdefs, right?
Just convert it over to the parallel mode unconditionally and get rid of
the existing cruft.
> /*
> * TTBR0 is only used for the identity mapping at this stage. Make it
> * point to zero page to avoid speculatively fetching new entries.
> @@ -254,7 +276,9 @@ asmlinkage notrace void secondary_start_kernel(void)
> read_cpuid_id());
> update_cpu_boot_status(cpu, CPU_BOOT_SUCCESS);
> set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PARALLEL
> complete(&cpu_running);
> +#endif
Just for the record. You can get rid of this completion w/o PARALLEL
hotplug by selecting HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP and implementing the
kick/sync parts.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-18 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 13:38 [PATCH RFC 0/3] arm64: Add HOTPLUG_PARALLEL support for secondary CPUs Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-11 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] cpu/hotplug: Introduce CONFIG_PARALLEL_SMT_PRIMARY_FIRST Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-18 15:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-11 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] arm64: smp: Pass CPU ID to update_cpu_boot_status() Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-11 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] arm64: Add HOTPLUG_PARALLEL support for secondary CPUs Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-12 15:45 ` Michael Kelley
2026-06-15 8:51 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-18 12:21 ` Will Deacon
2026-06-15 9:57 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-06-18 15:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-06-18 15:49 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-06-12 15:51 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] " Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877bnvdf1a.ffs@fw13 \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.kaplan@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mrigendra.chaubey@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox