From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACBB3EBF3E; Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771797975; cv=none; b=Zw4TvcXSyIboHq+CadZnEh/kNtCy2tZ01HWqMW7NMULJhfB5+O3rJqRx5J/yzUGfJ+vwAUCS4r7ELYFn1o+mLyRnJplqI1Zzgtf4ZWjSiehwWEa+fN+iK4VYJenGUCiXszzPs+vvfjFcKY++OseJMb9aSQ4yY8lgDJbP/i+lPfQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771797975; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4eFrB51vniyDERNmsKInct9htMUnpN6fsZBWfR52QiQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W77O9s5VqxrfAvU7naSsHqe8ojOQW8pmZtF0Ua6aWAjvcZxbjbV1gmntQHiZJ6HwFn7DMDh0R16wEZGJdnbTXAq+tNIecOxXgMXN6VwJ3X+33B4iUOSPq78nbKc6rAxwfNQu+sA5h93OmTDboQZ+kukCanGe1NA7RoE6G7rnuso= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Cn8vgPj4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Cn8vgPj4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B60BC116D0; Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:06:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1771797974; bh=4eFrB51vniyDERNmsKInct9htMUnpN6fsZBWfR52QiQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Cn8vgPj4mxX/Ll0NNxY1rQwyJ2pusRMOvLr6phG9p6gsGRAzlf4/BqZMz0IR1eegO nD41Y1xg/GrK6J+HZQBAX4DqPTDV6jWZ4b9MpwmBVQHs7wsv2oY4rqo+x7wAzQCHPX d7iYEf131h0dO4lq+ddQLExi/dcglJM9/+SlLW1ZF8dsMTPgM3V6WAWaV74e1l4jvB WizgJtcqW1z2zolPD8uM9Bxdc/FMrhvx/JSOH3lz6ZLEn7AUWZrHbrKYd3Krd/IYhT 8rLK7nnQmo7/XHmBdPjYCnMTO4jL4vyM+aJdRTEhlhm49QCigwEgT/ZvLJGqMJ3w/G HdtVVrM7tMQqw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jisheng Zhang , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Guo Ren Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] genirq: use runtime constant to optimize handle_arch_irq access In-Reply-To: <20260220090922.1506-3-jszhang@kernel.org> References: <20260220090922.1506-1-jszhang@kernel.org> <20260220090922.1506-3-jszhang@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2026 23:06:11 +0100 Message-ID: <877bs4wi0c.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Feb 20 2026 at 17:09, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > Currently, on GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER platforms, the handle_arch_irq > is a pointer which is set during booting, and every irq processing needs > to access it, so it sits in hot code path. We can use the > runtime constant mechanism which was introduced by Linus to speed up > its accessing. The proper solution is to use a static call and update it in set_handle_irq(). That removes the complete indirect call issue from the hot path. Thanks, tglx