From: Luis Henriques <luis@igalia.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd@bsbernd.com>,
Laura Promberger <laura.promberger@cern.ch>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Matt Harvey <mharvey@jumptrading.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] fuse: work queues to invalided dentries
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:17:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877bwp4sr6.fsf@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916135310.51177-1-luis@igalia.com> (Luis Henriques's message of "Tue, 16 Sep 2025 14:53:06 +0100")
Hey Miklos,
On Tue, Sep 16 2025, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> Here's a new version of the patchset to invalidate expired dentries. Most
> of the changes (and there are a lot of them!) result from the v5 review.
> See below for details.
Just a gentle ping to make sure it doesn't fall through the cracks.
Cheers,
--
Luís
> Changes since v5:
>
> - Changes to dcache: export shrink_dentry_list() and add new helper
> d_dispose_if_unused()
> - Reduced hash lock array size
> - Set 'inval_wq' max value to USHRT_MAX to prevent a potential overflow in
> secs_to_jiffies()
> - Updated 'inval_wq' parameter description and comment
> - Removed useless check in fuse_dentry_tree_del_node()
> - Make fuse_dentry_tree_work() use dcache helpers d_dispose_if_unused() and
> shrink_dentry_list()
> - Fix usage of need_resched() (replaced with cond_resched())
> - fuse_dentry_tree_cleanup() now simply does a WARN_ON() if there are
> non-empty trees
> - Removed TODO comment in fuse_conn_destroy() -- no need to prune trees
> - Have fuse_epoch_work() use of shrink_dcache_sb() instead of going through
> all the trees
> - Refactor fuse_conn_put() in a separate patch
> - Fix bug in fuse_dentry_tree_add_node() for cases where dentries have the
> same timeout
> - Reword some of the commits text
>
> Changes since v4:
>
> - Dropped extra check in fuse_dentry_tree_add_node() (Chunsheng)
> - Make the dentries trees global instead of per fuse_conn (Miklos)
> - Protect trees with hashed locking instead of a single lock (Miklos)
> - Added new work queue (2nd patch) specifically to handle epoch (Miklos)
>
> Changes since v3:
>
> - Use of need_resched() instead of limiting the work queue to run for 5
> seconds
> - Restore usage of union with rcu_head, in struct fuse_dentry
> - Minor changes in comments (e.g. s/workqueue/work queue/)
>
> Changes since v2:
>
> - Major rework, the dentries tree nodes are now in fuse_dentry and they are
> tied to the actual dentry lifetime
> - Mount option is now a module parameter
> - workqueue now runs for at most 5 seconds before rescheduling
>
> Luis Henriques (4):
> dcache: export shrink_dentry_list() and new helper
> d_dispose_if_unused()
> fuse: new work queue to periodically invalidate expired dentries
> fuse: new work queue to invalidate dentries from old epochs
> fuse: refactor fuse_conn_put() to remove negative logic.
>
> fs/dcache.c | 18 ++--
> fs/fuse/dev.c | 7 +-
> fs/fuse/dir.c | 237 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 14 +++
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 44 ++++----
> include/linux/dcache.h | 2 +
> 6 files changed, 273 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 13:53 [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] fuse: work queues to invalided dentries Luis Henriques
2025-09-16 13:53 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] dcache: export shrink_dentry_list() and add new helper d_dispose_if_unused() Luis Henriques
2025-09-16 13:53 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] fuse: new work queue to periodically invalidate expired dentries Luis Henriques
2025-09-16 13:53 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] fuse: new work queue to invalidate dentries from old epochs Luis Henriques
2025-09-16 13:53 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] fuse: refactor fuse_conn_put() to remove negative logic Luis Henriques
2025-10-20 13:17 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2025-11-13 9:02 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] fuse: work queues to invalided dentries Miklos Szeredi
2025-11-13 9:43 ` Luis Henriques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877bwp4sr6.fsf@igalia.com \
--to=luis@igalia.com \
--cc=bernd@bsbernd.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=laura.promberger@cern.ch \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mharvey@jumptrading.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox