From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DC71D79B8 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743536564; cv=none; b=EI8G89t9GtKd5BfdCwr/vfOH+Hpyb0Rf2Cri4wzcjXLVUMkKFz1Ov81TsTjQureCUGQK6nnfaCYQLBOJdQtZc3vrbk+EiaXO9ehJNcbEfLY+yoaeLGGrc7zuFf4nl+cWG6Gzk8Mf3A648RfbvOM4bCX46WkyrF0FAZXXRUhnNpI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743536564; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pQxv5Dt51GqwzaRvw88SWAtlH92vzbXWDPb6VUXwIJM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nFSXvljktXIAMz+d8J8WkaqTg11ml7z3WcJt/S1AXe9QX8zHhZKsTD26YF5c0mEHG7yOV5JyilR4arJVFIwbvWmf/dLGotyA4CJpCF58MDrUtkbBJVaRFRbTsAC3iZRT/jf7V9vw6ZcAhjKFQGE+v8ZTIqLuhPgOLO5VheyyzR8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Sb5hfMEd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Sb5hfMEd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743536562; x=1775072562; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=pQxv5Dt51GqwzaRvw88SWAtlH92vzbXWDPb6VUXwIJM=; b=Sb5hfMEd37KiPH8WJ6udn+dNQA4T1KjVqpITNTzURu53oeHMygOCC1oI e249hDfCVfQ4PjEZ+lT6v/j8kpe5vlFkhnQY3a2CijC9fy290XGAo5QTT GpNu+vt3CxaHDsaP9a+WToUTyi4nv8RLUkPDA9bNo7i/yhQYH3Tc6u5ZL iuRiD7/NcF5fbJjfaQkLOezqHEuJwQlXnupmT46KOvGN/1qXlQdHIzgFP s9NhHdxvt9Jc33vwIqCH81nD2/TS+klHYP7hAYcpf6HHpBRn026D4e5oH mjlEroVLqMZppT2xeR5a4odorizmDVn4Nlc1g+JiiND6/v4zL9rQJwTWa A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dROArJcKS82R9maRReTbyA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SV2C0i3dRx6Pd1cS/lmzkg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11391"; a="55538380" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,294,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="55538380" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2025 12:42:41 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TMKqicpOQbePKXBHOY1KMQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: qf68Du+PRm29D1/ggkQhQA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,294,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="157421072" Received: from ncintean-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.7]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Apr 2025 12:42:38 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Jason Gunthorpe , Masahiro Yamada Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dave Airlie , dri-devel , LKML Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.15-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20250401191455.GC325917@nvidia.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <87h6394i87.fsf@intel.com> <20250331133137.GA263675@nvidia.com> <87tt782htn.fsf@intel.com> <20250401191455.GC325917@nvidia.com> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 22:42:35 +0300 Message-ID: <877c433bys.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, 01 Apr 2025, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > So, I'd suggest a better way to run this is first build the kernel, > then mine the gcc -MD output (ie stored in the .XX.cmd files) to > generate a list of headers that are actually part of the build, then > only test those. That eliminates all the kconfig problems. Opt out any > special headers that really have a good reason not to be stand alone. I think we'd want the drm headers pass the checks independent of configs (apart from CONFIG_DRM). One size doesn't fit all. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel