From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
To: "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@proton.me>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: list: make the cursor point between elements
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:12:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877c6pchqi.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH5fLginoFU38HbRjtOY8wAOo9uu5LJD7AKzduRkL0RcT6BUvw@mail.gmail.com> (Alice Ryhl's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:52:50 +0100")
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:55 PM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alice,
>>
>> This looks like a nice improvement!
>
> Thanks!
>
>> This looks like a refactor of `push_front`, `push_back`. It looks like
>> it is unrelated to the cursor change. Can you split this out into a
>> separate patch?
>
> I don't think it's unrelated. It extracts out common code that
> previously only push_front/push_back have, but that the cursor now
> also needs. Of course, it could still make sense to extract
> insert_inner out in a separate patch.
I think that would make sense.
>
>> > @@ -489,17 +480,21 @@ pub fn push_all_back(&mut self, other: &mut List<T, ID>) {
>> > other.first = ptr::null_mut();
>> > }
>> >
>> > - /// Returns a cursor to the first element of the list.
>> > - ///
>> > - /// If the list is empty, this returns `None`.
>> > - pub fn cursor_front(&mut self) -> Option<Cursor<'_, T, ID>> {
>> > - if self.first.is_null() {
>> > - None
>> > - } else {
>> > - Some(Cursor {
>> > - current: self.first,
>> > - list: self,
>> > - })
>> > - }
>> > - }
>> > + /// Returns a cursor that points before the first element of the list.
>> > + pub fn cursor_front(&mut self) -> Cursor<'_, T, ID> {
>> > + // INVARIANT: `self.first` is in this list.
>> > + Cursor {
>> > + next: self.first,
>> > + list: self,
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + /// Returns a cursor that points after the last element in the list.
>> > + pub fn cursor_back(&mut self) -> Cursor<'_, T, ID> {
>> > + // INVARIANT: `next` is allowed to be null.
>> > + Cursor {
>> > + next: core::ptr::null_mut(),
>>
>> I am slightly confused about why you need to track the beginning and end
>> of the list. The cursor movement operations circle have wrapping
>> semantics and the lists are circular. Could you remove some code by
>> using this property?
>
> I think the current API is much more intuitive. Yes, the list is
> implemented in a circular manner, but you're not intended to think of
> it that way. The linked list is a list of elements. With elements ABC
> and cursors pointing between them, it makes sense that the cursor can
> be |ABC, A|BC, AB|C, ABC|. In each case, you can add an element before
> or after the cursor. To iterate the list, you keep calling `move_next`
> until `next` returns `None`. That also makes sense. If the cursor
> becomes circular, then you iterate by calling `next` until the next
> element is the first element? Seems confusing to me.
You might be right. But then again, in your patch the cursor _does_ wrap to the front
when it is at the end. If we did not treat beginning and end as two
separate states, we could remove a lot of edge case checks, see below.
In your experience using the API, did you use the feature that
`move_next` will wrap to the front? If the cursor is circular, maybe
`move_next` and `move_prev` should should be no-ops when the cursor is
in edge positions?
With a circular cursor, you would need to compare to first or last as to
break an iteration loop. I think that is how the C API works.
With a circular cursor it would be something like this
let mut c = list.cursor_front();
let last = c.peek_prev();
loop {
let el = c.peek_next();
// Do stuff
if el == last {
break;
}
}
For a non-circular cursor
let mut c = list.cursor_front();
loop {
let el = c.peek_next();
if el.is_none() {
break
}
// Do stuff
c.move_next();
}
Not too much difference?
diff --git a/rust/kernel/list.rs b/rust/kernel/list.rs
index 328d3e369d571..e1d0608e66dc8 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/list.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/list.rs
@@ -589,26 +589,15 @@ pub struct Cursor<'a, T: ?Sized + ListItem<ID>, const ID: u64 = 0> {
impl<'a, T: ?Sized + ListItem<ID>, const ID: u64> Cursor<'a, T, ID> {
/// Returns a pointer to the element before the cursor.
- ///
- /// Returns null if there is no element before the cursor.
fn prev_ptr(&self) -> *mut ListLinksFields {
- let mut next = self.next;
- let first = self.list.first;
- if next == first {
- // We are before the first element.
- return core::ptr::null_mut();
- }
-
- if next.is_null() {
- // We are after the last element, so we need a pointer to the last element, which is
- // the same as `(*first).prev`.
- next = first;
+ if self.next.is_null() {
+ return self.next;
}
// SAFETY: `next` can't be null, because then `first` must also be null, but in that case
// we would have exited at the `next == first` check. Thus, `next` is an element in the
// list, so we can access its `prev` pointer.
- unsafe { (*next).prev }
+ unsafe { (*self.next).prev }
}
/// Access the element after this cursor.
@@ -648,8 +637,6 @@ pub fn peek_prev(&mut self) -> Option<CursorPeek<'_, 'a, T, false, ID>> {
/// If the cursor is after the last element, then the cursor will move back to the beginning.
pub fn move_next(&mut self) {
if self.next.is_null() {
- // INVARIANT: `list.first` is in the list or null.
- self.next = self.list.first;
return;
}
@@ -657,10 +644,6 @@ pub fn move_next(&mut self) {
// access the `next` field.
let mut next = unsafe { (*self.next).next };
- if next == self.list.first {
- next = core::ptr::null_mut();
- }
-
// INVARIANT: `next` is either null or the next element after an element in the list.
self.next = next;
}
@@ -670,24 +653,13 @@ pub fn move_next(&mut self) {
/// If the cursor is before the first element, then the cursor will move to the end of the
/// list.
pub fn move_prev(&mut self) {
- if self.next == self.list.first {
- // We are before the first element, so move the cursor after the last element.
- // INVARIANT: `next` can be a null pointer.
- self.next = core::ptr::null_mut();
- return;
- }
-
// INVARIANT: `prev_ptr()` always returns a pointer that is null or in the list.
self.next = self.prev_ptr();
}
/// Inserts an element where the cursor is pointing and get a pointer to the new element.
fn insert_inner(&mut self, item: ListArc<T, ID>) -> *mut ListLinksFields {
- let ptr = if self.next.is_null() {
- self.list.first
- } else {
- self.next
- };
+ let ptr = self.next;
// SAFETY:
// * `ptr` is an element in the list or null.
// * if `ptr` is null, then `self.list.first` is null so the list is empty.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-20 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <RDzzJkrT7QOUu_FAcJyNOJx3ZW9gzDG7vi-z94_5G6YiTgp8yKUu_U4QYVyTXrzTi9eK4BIiANZ4LboxAchm-w==@protonmail.internalid>
2024-10-25 13:36 ` [PATCH] rust: list: make the cursor point between elements Alice Ryhl
2025-01-20 11:55 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-01-20 15:52 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-20 21:12 ` Andreas Hindborg [this message]
2025-01-21 7:55 ` Alice Ryhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877c6pchqi.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox