From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, maz@kernel.org,
vincent.whitchurch@axis.com, iwtbavbm@gmail.com,
158710936@qq.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Keep handle_nested_irq() from touching desc->threads_active
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:23:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cewwtbm.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240609183046.GA14050@iZj6chx1xj0e0buvshuecpZ>
On Mon, Jun 10 2024 at 02:30, Peng Liu wrote:
> handle_nested_irq() is supposed to be running inside the parent thread
> handler context. It per se has no dedicated kernel thread, thus shouldn't
> touch desc->threads_active. The parent kernel thread has already taken
> care of this.
No it has not. The parent thread has marked itself in the parent threads
interrupt descriptor.
How does that help synchronizing the nested interrupt, which has a
separate interrupt descriptor?
> Fixes: e2c12739ccf7 ("genirq: Prevent nested thread vs synchronize_hardirq() deadlock")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
There is nothing to fix.
> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <iwtbavbm@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Despite of its correctness, I'm afraid the testing on my only PC can't
> cover the affected code path. So the patch may be totally -UNTESTED-.
Which correctness?
The change log of the commit you want to "fix" says:
Remove the incorrect usage in the nested threaded interrupt case and
instead re-use the threads_active / wait_for_threads mechanism to
wait for nested threaded interrupts to complete.
It's very clearly spelled out, no?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-09 18:30 [PATCH] genirq: Keep handle_nested_irq() from touching desc->threads_active Peng Liu
2024-06-10 18:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-06-11 13:19 ` Peng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cewwtbm.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=158710936@qq.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iwtbavbm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox