From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464807D07F for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 10:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715164255; cv=none; b=qci/au+2pmgUdkYKD36akxwq54LXA3KjRquBOzetN9DZkhSXwfRFLD3/VEJh0hwpX03UR/naQTXecH0Zcc39zO5YcJl5cIyKLEkxk9v/1g3hG+a2GAcDwsD5kGMyMbjNdIV192mhCCA9WpEIgPximDMXPRZA0enCVtkP0eDAzw8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715164255; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1s1srL/0Gf207uvzugl9RQeAHt4XjTI3gJLbGtQOu+Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BW3QQ7aPjeCEOnSL78hzJw1a/b9SQoEVC0UD/ysbs05PJTEzUcrMdH8bVe7ni2PONOXv14RtHATm/NsoQV9RAewg7Fb9AgALP8+B4A6sFm/2uEy+MI3WEBVAZyYeY/IVvlyvWH+L5NDXr9f6mRkOyhlFu8KhrM37UfHhiOu919A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=zQOUulpr; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=kwT/hKoY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="zQOUulpr"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="kwT/hKoY" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1715164246; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VPZyOXQkR021LGnLEOzBIbVQbMD9fJILR+LSRL1gNE4=; b=zQOUulprpgeUMTHmL0oMnJryQerhGSotERp6mn92CcyQsc9dwNQGFKUgYmlh2OUfm858hd GJgvBQJLIOIpqWSifqQJ+BwlKMseEq2uQ1pLb4g/2G6TdEhxToGjxdl2eViRdFZrYR2tRx QvfmXf+cAWb6lwBKC0cvtwvGpZ0Lm1aJgXrcpxNQrwJilWmVdZ9wQ9ChYzBkMJ8b+uq/+X Bqoelu91pkSP3Efetzxt6Wwok8Bosgt+eJYkpoUmElK9pUh504ur+yzv3fmwbeqgr70qMu vmNJecHdOgVaBv8zslbVDtyRLRjfOJU0GsJA2w2o32TNTR8YgKcTq1jfFC5GWA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1715164246; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VPZyOXQkR021LGnLEOzBIbVQbMD9fJILR+LSRL1gNE4=; b=kwT/hKoYTCSSfWR9UBWCfdlbHqamionQcfGl08K7KQH/f5NdtzedvV8c9JB0+PwYM4ABcY I2OYPGALZqbIkSDA== To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" , Lyude Paul Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mario Limonciello , Borislav Petkov , Linux kernel regressions list Subject: Re: Early boot regression from f0551af0213 ("x86/topology: Ignore non-present APIC IDs in a present package") In-Reply-To: <51d0dff8-2888-463c-95ab-71b491f12a8f@leemhuis.info> References: <3d77cb89857ee43a9c31249f4eab7196013bc4b4.camel@redhat.com> <20240418082703.GCZiDZVyra7qOQbyqn@fat_crate.local> <87plumxz4x.ffs@tglx> <87le59vw1y.ffs@tglx> <3a0afe545747e5314a9cb6bbaa9ce90b259ddfac.camel@redhat.com> <87edautcmz.ffs@tglx> <3b1d16e357c1f9badeef405366492f05af26c085.camel@redhat.com> <878r11t8zu.ffs@tglx> <016902d9-3858-4c65-b3ec-f7a5103af63c@amd.com> <51d0dff8-2888-463c-95ab-71b491f12a8f@leemhuis.info> Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 12:30:46 +0200 Message-ID: <877cg4ppd5.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, May 08 2024 at 10:38, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > H! Lyude, Thomas, what's the status here? From here it looks like we > were close to a fix, but then it turned out to be a bad fix -- and > afterwards nothing much seems to have happened. Did it fall through the > cracks, or was this already fixed and I just missed that? I'm waiting for more data still. Thanks, tglx