From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E6812C526; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712070698; cv=none; b=nO49ZsR3haN6eRcmgEhJv+z4nqVVLoIoetTVjMn52YoJH+sSrINgAh/kd3kTShqQJC/J8ZSRS3qtmsfbeLCMl4pd1hj1NXElc9fb0ZPRsqBz5T3AHQ0N9vwLDf9DYS8UCF1BtAOuwUV5C3Y9tlaclO7eIfWaIHt6HspgMauUODc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712070698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MlIvE42l0NzRMnJ2ZNOCzLjJI3UJGeE/J4+BUsMeGtY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tph5/3q/b44ry0kxHExQNZ6Vx9290j5GaCFIxNzf/lbRXIDUwtWFkG7CpBHt9KCFF2Wk6hh4IrFRnC5t2zO/XW9/B0JHkUIA2LDQNK2xN/SSB9xdor3pq8oltrK2D81miGSywUjgizCOmKWZqA773OHCXP5oXoeT7QgAogMlwHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=V/1YlGNP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="V/1YlGNP" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 7FECB47C1D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1712070696; bh=MlIvE42l0NzRMnJ2ZNOCzLjJI3UJGeE/J4+BUsMeGtY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=V/1YlGNPjaSw7IbFjR8KyupsLg73cZ9GPKUjx4z2d3jVwcoS4zgcwLs+Od5jvI+jv rHIFH0rTCEN4tpZyFx9kSN0yjgKbdgDmqs6Po2hJcZzzdmMaRig5U341jPWa0wywqu HfO2z4TqYOGMipS903MQZcdBqqPjh8n4wfeXOoUszSRe1+bfkbRLoskDlbgukumePy iP4bqhKPJ3fG9bh1dYL9Id4IckkuU60Hw/uPI2/9zd5PkshaOUduzA4odT9mViucmt sup7uEhn26klrmHwt5S8AiJlrMu8vF+7hF0qv+ARrnuRqZPQQpyyAe+UvhJyqzIl6C ZIbMkrxZDHL5A== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::646]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FECB47C1D; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:11:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Christoph Hellwig , Frank Li Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lizhijian@fujitsu.com, mst@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] docs: dma: correct dma_set_mask() sample code In-Reply-To: References: <20240401174159.642998-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 09:11:35 -0600 Message-ID: <877chfyf2w.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Christoph Hellwig writes: > This looks good to me: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Jon, do you want to pick this up through the Documentation tree, or > should I take it through the dma-mapping tree? I'm going though my patch queue right now, as it happens, so I'll just go ahead and apply it. Thanks, jon