From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shikemeng@huaweicloud.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] ext4: remove unnecessary return for void function
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 21:13:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cqtl179.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230721171007.2065423-6-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> writes:
> The return at end of void function is nunecessary, just remove it.
s/nunecessary/unnecessary
Note, while applying this patch series on ted's dev branch, I got a
conflict in this patch. It's eaier to resolve, however you might want to
make sure that it is cleanly applicable on a given tree in v2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index b838944b5f09..78160bf5b533 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -4880,7 +4880,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_generate_from_freelist(struct super_block *sb, void *bitmap,
> mb_set_bits(bitmap, entry->efd_start_cluster, entry->efd_count);
> n = rb_next(n);
> }
> - return;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -5634,12 +5633,10 @@ static void ext4_mb_show_ac(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> #else
> static inline void ext4_mb_show_pa(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> - return;
> }
> static inline void ext4_mb_show_ac(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> {
> ext4_mb_show_pa(ac->ac_sb);
> - return;
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -5885,7 +5882,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_add_n_trim(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> order, lg_prealloc_count);
> return;
Why not kill this ^^ return too?
> }
> - return ;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -6470,7 +6466,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> }
> error_return:
> ext4_std_error(sb, err);
> - return;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -6573,7 +6568,6 @@ void ext4_free_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> }
>
> ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle, inode, block, count, flags);
> - return;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.30.0
With above addressed, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-21 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 17:09 [PATCH 00/10] A few fixes and cleanups to mballoc Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:55 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-25 2:09 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/10] ext4: correct grp validation in ext4_mb_good_group Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:22 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] ext4: avoid potential data overflow in next_linear_group Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:26 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:31 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] ext4: use is_power_of_2 helper in ext4_mb_regular_allocator Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:37 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] ext4: remove unnecessary return for void function Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:43 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] ext4: replace the traditional ternary conditional operator with with max()/min() Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:44 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] ext4: remove unused ext4_{set}/{clear}_bit_atomic Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:45 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] ext4: return found group directly in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:48 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-07-21 17:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] ext4: correct some stale comment of criteria Kemeng Shi
2023-07-21 15:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cqtl179.fsf@doe.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox