Re: [PATCH 07/15] dt-bindings: clock: Add Ambarella clock bindings

Li Chen
2023-02-06T11:28:49Z

Hi Krzysztof ,

---- On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 23:08:09 +0800 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote ---
> On 27/01/2023 15:48, Li Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > but what you are saying is that there is no separate clock controller
> > > device with its own IO address but these clocks are part of rct_syscon.
> > > Then model it that way in DTS. The rct_syscon is then your clock
> > > controller and all these fake gclk-core and gclk-ddr nodes should be gone.
> >
> > Ok, I will remove these fake nodes, and model the hardware as:
> >
> > rct_syscon node
> > | clock node(pll, div, mux, composite clocks live in the same driver)
> > | other periphal nodes
>
> You need clock node if it takes any resources. If it doesn't, you do not
> need it.

If the only hardware resource the clock node can take is its parent clock(clocks = <&osc>;),
then can I have this clock node?

Regards,
Li