linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 10:02:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dbbq5om.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o84qpk7d.fsf@redhat.com>

Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:

> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 1/3/22 13:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>>   'allowlist' of things which can change (and put
>>> *APICids there) and only fail KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} when we see something
>>> else changing.
>>
>> We could also go the other way and only deny changes that result in 
>> changed CPU caps.  That should be easier to implement since we have 
>> already a mapping from CPU capability words to CPUID leaves and registers.
>>
>
> Good idea, I'll look into it (if noone beats me to it).

(just getting to it)

On the other hand, e.g. MAXPHYADDR (CPUID 0x80000008.EAX) is not a CPU
cap but it's one of the main reasons why we want to forbid
KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN in the first place. I'm also not sure
about allowing PV feature bits changes (KVM, Hyper-V, Xen) and I don't
think there's a need for that.

I'm again leaning towards an allowlist and currently I see only two
candidates:

CPUID.01H.EBX bits 31:24 (initial LAPIC id)
CPUID.0BH.EDX (x2APIC id)

Anything else I'm missing?

-- 
Vitaly


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-07  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-22 17:58 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Avoid KVM_SET_CPUID2 after KVM_RUN in hyperv_features test Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-22 17:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-26 12:20   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-27 17:32     ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-02 17:31       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-03  8:04         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-03  9:40           ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-03 12:56             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-05  8:17               ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-05  9:12                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-05  9:10               ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-05 10:09                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-07  9:02                   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-01-07 18:15                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-11  8:00                       ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-12 13:58                         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-12 18:39                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-13  9:27                             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 14:28                               ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 14:36                                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 14:41                                   ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 14:59                                     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-13 16:26                                       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-13 16:30                                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-13 22:33             ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  8:28               ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-01-14 16:08                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-14  8:55               ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-14  9:31                 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-14 11:22                   ` Igor Mammedov
2022-01-14 12:25                     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-14 17:00                       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-01-17  9:55                         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-01-17 11:20                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-17 13:02                             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dbbq5om.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).