From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>,
Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com
Cc: wangle6@huawei.com, xiaoqian9@huawei.com, shaolexi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 19:27:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dgpp852.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48cddad4-0388-ae8b-f98b-1629b9ae590a@redhat.com>
On Sun, Aug 08 2021 at 23:01, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 8/8/21 10:12 PM, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
>> Semaphore is sleeping lock. Add might_sleep() to down*() family
>> (with exception of down_trylock()) to detect atomic context sleep.
>> @@ -157,6 +160,7 @@ int down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long timeout)
>> unsigned long flags;
>> int result = 0;
>>
>> + might_sleep();
>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
>> if (likely(sem->count > 0))
>> sem->count--;
>
> I think it is simpler to just put a "might_sleep()" in __down_common()
> which is the function where sleep can actually happen.
No. Putting it in __down_common() is wrong, because that covers only the
contended case.
But we want to cover the potential sleep, i.e. checking even in the
non-contended case, which is what might_sleep() is about.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 2:12 [PATCH] semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-09 3:01 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-09 3:51 ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-09 12:52 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-09 14:33 ` Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-13 17:27 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-08-13 18:47 ` Waiman Long
2021-08-13 14:43 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23 9:39 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/semaphore: " tip-bot2 for Xiaoming Ni
2021-08-31 11:13 ` [PATCH] semaphore: " Guenter Roeck
2021-08-31 11:39 ` Hanjun Guo
2021-08-31 12:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-31 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-31 12:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-08-31 12:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-08-31 17:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-09-01 8:37 ` [tip: smp/urgent] drivers: base: cacheinfo: Get rid of DEFINE_SMP_CALL_CACHE_FUNCTION() tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dgpp852.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shaolexi@huawei.com \
--cc=wangle6@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoqian9@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox