From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754575AbaE3HAq (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 03:00:46 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:47783 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751782AbaE3HAo (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2014 03:00:44 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Jens Axboe , Ming Lei Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: virtio_blk: don't hold spin lock during world switch In-Reply-To: <5387FC96.4030508@kernel.dk> References: <1401418169-3361-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <5387F8B2.1070509@kernel.dk> <5387FC96.4030508@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:40:02 +0930 Message-ID: <877g537q6d.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe writes: > If Rusty agrees, I'd like to add it for 3.16 with a stable marker. Really stable? It improves performance, which is nice. But every patch which goes into the kernel fixes a bug, improves clarity, improves performance or adds a feature. I've now seen all four cases get CC'd into stable. Including some of mine explicitly not marked stable which get swept up by enthusiastic stable maintainers :( Is now there *any* patch short of a major rewrite which shouldn't get cc: stable? Cheers, Rusty.