From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/25] perf tool: Add support for multiple data file storage
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:57:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877geprr4f.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130909111749.GP31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:17:49 +0200")
Hi Peter and Jiri,
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:17:49 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> hi,
>> sending the support for multiple file storage. Initial
>> RFC is here:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137408381902423&w=2
>>
>> v2 changes:
>> - reworked perf mmap size setup to be able to get
>> the mmap size value easily later
>> - added perf.data read/write test for v2 and v3
>> for both endianity
>> - added record '-M time' support
>
> So this 0/n post seems to have forgotten to list the rationale for doing
> all this..
>
> The only reason I wanted this is so that each thread can write its own
> data. The current one file thing is an immense bottle-neck for big
> machines.
Per-thread or per-cpu? In my perf ftrace patchset, I used to per-cpu
data file for this reason. Do you think per-thread approach is better
than per-cpu one?
Jiri, one of my colleagues asked me about the multiple file support
separated by time while ago. At that time I just added --time-filter
option to perf report, but it'd better if perf record can support it.
(Unfortunately the patch seems to buried in the list).
Anyway, as Peter said, please consider per-thread or per-cpu multiple
file support with your series. It will help further developments.
Thanks,
Namhyung
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-01 10:36 [PATCHv2 00/25] perf tool: Add support for multiple data file storage Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 01/25] perf tools: Check mmap pages value early Jiri Olsa
2013-10-15 5:24 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 02/25] perf tools: Add possibility to specify mmap size Jiri Olsa
2013-10-15 5:25 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 03/25] perf tools: Introduce perf_evlist__new_default function Jiri Olsa
2013-10-15 5:25 ` [tip:perf/core] perf evlist: " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 04/25] perf tools: Adding throttle event data struct support Jiri Olsa
2013-10-15 5:25 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 05/25] perf tests: Add simple session read/write test Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 06/25] perf tests: Add session reading test for little endian perf data Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 07/25] perf tests: Add session reading test for big " Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 08/25] perf doc: Add perf data file documentation Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 09/25] perf tools: Introduce perf data file version CHECK macro Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 10/25] perf tools: Introduce swap_features function Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 11/25] perf tools: Introduce swap_header function Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 12/25] perf tools: Separate version 2 specific perf data header bits Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 13/25] perf tools: Using evlist as a holder for event_desc feature Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 14/25] perf tools: Introduce perf.data version 3 format Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 15/25] perf tools: Add perf data version 3 header swap Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 16/25] perf tools: Add perf data version 3 header read Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 17/25] perf tools: Add perf.data version 3 header write Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 18/25] perf tools: Get rid of post_processing_offset in record command Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 19/25] perf tools: Move synthesizing into single function Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 20/25] perf tools: Add perf_data_file__open interface to data object Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 21/25] perf tools: Separating data file properties from session Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 22/25] perf tests: Add session reading test for little endian perf data v3 Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 23/25] perf tests: Add session reading test for big " Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 24/25] perf tools: Add multi file '-M' option for record command Jiri Olsa
2013-09-02 7:52 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-09-02 8:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-02 9:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-09-02 9:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-01 10:36 ` [PATCH 25/25] perf tools: Have the process properly sythesized in subsequent data files Jiri Olsa
2013-09-02 2:42 ` [PATCHv2 00/25] perf tool: Add support for multiple data file storage Andi Kleen
2013-09-09 11:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 11:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-09 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-09 14:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-09 14:11 ` David Ahern
2013-09-09 14:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-09-09 15:03 ` David Ahern
2013-09-14 18:32 ` David Ahern
2013-09-09 16:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-09-10 17:29 ` David Ahern
2013-09-10 6:54 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-09-10 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-09-10 8:57 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877geprr4f.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox