From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761607Ab3DDOVI (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:21:08 -0400 Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:33122 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761434Ab3DDOVF (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Apr 2013 10:21:05 -0400 From: Chris Ball To: "Luca Porzio \(lporzio\)" Cc: Yaniv Gardi , "linux-mmc\@vger.kernel.org" , "vgoyal\@redhat.com" , "tj\@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: card: Adding support for sanitize in eMMC 4.5 References: <1361705927-10524-1-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> <26E7A31274623843B0E8CF86148BFE32B02F5779@NTXAVZMBX04.azit.micron.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:20:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <26E7A31274623843B0E8CF86148BFE32B02F5779@NTXAVZMBX04.azit.micron.com> (Luca Porzio's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:36:55 +0000") Message-ID: <877gkipebd.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Yaniv, Maya, On Mon, Mar 11 2013, Luca Porzio (lporzio) wrote: > In case of Sanitize timeout, the eMMC might go in an unclear state. > May I suggest to: > - issue an HPI before leaving thus bring the eMMC back into safe status > - report the 'sanitize not complete error' and let the user decide on > Whether he wants to re-issue (i.e. continue) the sanitize or just let > it go. Can you respond to this review feedback from Luca, please? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child