linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately)
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:09:45 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gud4ybi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120704105533.GB21704@redhat.com>

On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:55:33 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:17:46AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case
> > > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in
> > > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple
> > > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to
> > > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work.
> > 
> > It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :(
> > 
> > I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree,
> > otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge.  But I'll await your
> > push before pushing to Linus next merge window.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
> 
> While theoretical mine is a bugfix so could be 3.5 material, no?

It's a little thin, but it's a good idea.  I'll try.

Cheers,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-09  0:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <patchbomb.1320306168@localhost6.localdomain6>
2011-11-03  7:42 ` [PATCH 1 of 5] virtio: document functions better Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  7:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03  7:42 ` [PATCH 2 of 5] virtio: rename virtqueue_add_buf_gfp to virtqueue_add_buf Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  7:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03  7:42 ` [PATCH 3 of 5] virtio: support unlocked queue kick Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  7:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 10:09     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-11-04 10:36     ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  7:42 ` [PATCH 4 of 5] virtio: avoid modulus operation Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  7:51   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-03 10:18     ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03  7:42 ` [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately Rusty Russell
2011-11-13 21:03   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-14  0:43     ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-14  6:56     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-16  0:21       ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-16  7:18         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-21  1:48           ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-21 11:57             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22  0:33               ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-22  6:29                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-23  1:19                   ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-23  8:30                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01  9:20   ` RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately) Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02  1:05     ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-02  7:25       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02 16:08         ` Rafael Aquini
2012-07-03  0:47           ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-03 16:26             ` Rafael Aquini
2012-07-04 10:55             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-08 23:39               ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-07-04 10:55           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02  7:33       ` [PATCH RFC] virtio-balloon: fix add/get API use Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-04  3:27         ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877gud4ybi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).