From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753764Ab2ENBfP (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2012 21:35:15 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:45454 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753259Ab2ENBfN (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 May 2012 21:35:13 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen , "Al Viro" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rr tree In-Reply-To: <20120510185155.47d24f37951786b64af97868@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20120510185155.47d24f37951786b64af97868@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:59:34 +0930 Message-ID: <877gwfv9c1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 May 2012 18:51:55 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got conflicts in > kernel/lglock.c, include/linux/lglock.h, fs/namespace.c and fs/internal.h > between various commits from the rr tree and commit "brlocks/lglocks: > cleanups" from the akpm tree. > > The akpm tree patch seems to be a merge of the rr tree commits, so I > dropped the akpm tree patch. Al said he'd take them, so I dropped mine now too. Thanks, Rusty.