From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A1D3A1693; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 19:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783451034; cv=none; b=t6nq0QiOPtWxMmMfRfCxLXThqacunBkKt91ZobHtWyy+Qs/OdijOKfVYLfV3Er+ZDoGbEJWl3rFazJHe+4tgKYQYp/nGI8+/5Dgp0Y4Pf8XYesqbzhuI6IEj+PhuzCwpphT2V1fAhOva4+8Breas94ZSwxeLOGqwEBRh5TjJaEk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783451034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=62qobkfwgb/I1gOvXBP5Qfc7oMKhVS8eaJ/kQvZ6WWo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gjKM8XziS1oL8Oel1R6Pmapsq9J3J+xAK84yGY8vNY5sn2rjabjVfJpLGlaGXPvgy85kJK52V8RP/HjhxgkNnv7aAk6aUBYmKw7a4BIrkM/1t1vTDLrKyTz1SBz48NMVqfeb0ax4d+L8EWahWz/6VcbQWXKtZNIIDCJSYSONllI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=IzZw73A0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="IzZw73A0" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 94CDE40430 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1783451032; bh=EJszX5eNF4dlP8trcZdSt3w2lkANfhcDNIvg9VWnzVY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=IzZw73A043nmFG6dyet8VMLSKaUzm/fCZpd6Q4FGDU75IWRK7it1frNuobeAVu9Uu yIAyvn+LZOqbrsumXt6N7ePmds/WwVQ1sZWzPUKIhFYv8bU5dirLfDOEX/fKU/Zvv5 2lT4saAdgOLpV4MQ1b6ertmzY3fBjzD3x2YnX6/OQaWBpSkYcfmb9EE9ewxz4L9HTS BHSvPjD13ipOZ9ClwjRmZw2UTZtk6h2B/j1ibsARu+QpxseP97C3rrnrkfIAMtsRZI DXgX6pS4LWFCTvCFDUY9crWGNksKnlQWokQxb0SQ8bvH007cQuDBLrpKjfbp7SGeD4 HOwBs7FPeVh1g== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:27b::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94CDE40430; Tue, 7 Jul 2026 19:03:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Christian Brauner , Christian Brauner Cc: Laurent Pinchart , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" , Lorenzo Stoakes , Boris Burkov , Jeff Layton , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Justin Stitt , Carlos Maiolino , Jakub Kicinski , Jori Koolstra , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Brian Foster , Christoph Hellwig , David Disseldorp , Mark Brown , Jani Nikula , Jens Axboe , Vlastimil Babka , workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: remove the requirement for LLM attribution In-Reply-To: <20260707-impfschutz-lerngruppen-klubhaus-7aabcc82f3b4@brauner> References: <20260702211740.GA639365@zen.localdomain> <3f447113-4407-471f-878f-e6d6edafee71@kernel.org> <20260703163251.GB3734786@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <0ba6bf66-e48f-40df-a953-503d317b3dbe@kernel.org> <20260707124031.GC211515@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260707141803.GA254690@killaraus.ideasonboard.com> <20260707-siebzehn-geleast-gastmahl-4889a8f6b474@brauner> <20260707-impfschutz-lerngruppen-klubhaus-7aabcc82f3b4@brauner> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:03:51 -0600 Message-ID: <878q7mr59k.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Christian Brauner writes: >> Then someone can basically just merge the original patch I sent since >> everyone seems to agree on that front. And then the extension to include >> how the LLM was used can be discussed in a separate patch. > > https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-work-coding-assistants-v1-1-a20a94d1d606@kernel.org I still have it around :) I can apply it if that's truly the consensus... I'll confess to having not entirely kept up with the conversation over the holiday weekend, though, and needing to review things. If you object, do let me know. Thanks, jon