From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347CD2FE05F; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756992160; cv=none; b=IvSrk/cKc/f04Cwkk21bi0dzIgGwjlY0an0lvIPHgcPEeyI5Fbqfq+AJlUCTLdBiXyHa5McvIwQIp8xiatZvh1aD75f87J7wIHT9tLH+Dqmo8Wt9f2RS03l2tyB5iNaNFIk33wllYzhh139xYMUpF4gwa/V+GhFsElLRChq0qRo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756992160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MJoKl3nZIVYgflwLVJKwukC+oP7B/0y6TE5o/EX3ifM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YMdyB/CGFVxK07FSsdcqXndjZya93DjG1Jkyqz91O8s9yZqWeVPrTC49LyUA+tmx1cFV3HVobg7vCAg8mzTIknCgLiZGybNGxhj/Ai9qFz1riGoBUat/lr+GA9KzdX/FypLQjkIlzLNRc/dvSXils82/aJ++tpcDjfwkWuacevA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=DnmiXVU/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="DnmiXVU/" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 0D88F40AFD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1756992158; bh=BK03jMMk5Bp5Pi3nrPCq2zhRBB7WcROGWUToeOzSCzM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DnmiXVU//AC1Jg75YFm0yovk+hYyjXFgntRfysI+fFYYudlNaJsAWvPfrNzAYOEAh lt1KpN02CkUAO4tKhvNJXRFb7d8j+s3J1hG+egfAiotqu1vlIAbiGtuBj3ByStAWF6 atqwVZfVUmLHiWtLgMz/ljsFjjnBcWo4ubYQV3FrXyCDpiUKHHH0gJRGMaRhXTnvfT pDmBMn8ZYASgc6rfyu2xfzCDOnSUX9U2VXd+FjoPH6JUGPt2NJyeZ9idFcm1NcsyxK eegBgzkxwuNWqu8KCoMlT5JVCXeAMTe2OHZSWfsbirktBVIXi/U4UatTHePsav0wj2 UhBldZ3T7L2Ow== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D88F40AFD; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:22:37 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: kurita , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: akiyks@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kurita Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: ja_JP: Update SubmittingPatches for 'Fixes:' tag In-Reply-To: <20250903113552.2010371-1-akito5623@gmail.com> References: <20250903113552.2010371-1-akito5623@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 07:22:37 -0600 Message-ID: <878qiunyhu.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain kurita writes: > The Japanese translation of SubmittingPatches is based on an old > kernel version (2.6.39) and is missing several new sections. > > This patch adds the missing description for the 'Fixes:' tag to > bring the document more in line with the current English original > (Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst). > > Signed-off-by:Akiyoshi kurita > --- > Documentation/translations/ja_JP/SubmittingPatches | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) So I only saw this because of Akira's response; something in how you are sending your mail drives SpamAssassin nuts. Thank you for working to improve our documentation! In addition to everything Akira said, I must express a bit of worry about updating this document piecemeal in this way. Backporting specific pieces in this way will yield a result that is not a translation of anything - it is a new creation that never existed in the original form. It sure would be nicer (says the guy who has no ability to do that work) to bring the translation as a whole current. I'll accept pieces with acks from people who can properly judge them, but I would prefer to just have a current translation. Thanks, jon