From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E468285C9C for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751287874; cv=none; b=DLkJNeGbX7T7PbziX9em2FmuJtdbpDNitEIJko9CMdIQMhswfP5KCQx/XcLi8LAoEeSJat/fKxjoOg9CgGvBTnmOl0wSEWO00JzjqZLBztMcBbmrR0+6QjAcAZ8L7sqREyFyc1cnE+je9iaMp2yjTLnKsbH52Vm0jUzoAJ2nelM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751287874; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8ujMhUl7i4M3zObpjxjLUh1ZT+VHzlsAgD+fcoPERC8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=obTXrWrUfdk0b2NAiCegdVfezC0OiiDxzwRBLC7jAIl9YfeiEW5XAjOwkfaPoTpREgAPIrlBI3vk9lodq92qr4JWU/4wUSL/jiax6TDeCQRKdTQi2lMCPbwfjXG19eyLcCdHFEoVzwI0Ns8JOtc090yg5LCnjkD7xSF8s4ayhuU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=TSyDPUrP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="TSyDPUrP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1751287872; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=84LuPZ9pN40vZZj6LotxaTZH2u/8fUAdfMA409beGHI=; b=TSyDPUrP4Vj5OtqEA7MLBoNqkFaMa3sKRKU4Msq3IUaxJy2sW7xudL1j7AhEDYu/FPT4U+ YnkUl2zMZFhVSBgoUlETigXfFoCVjqSzMYoCoEHIX8ibod39okdS8shQy1lOPCNDumfYNT q7WnnJvjdNQEx3TGBxLkgOhY/rl9344= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-624-CKIX6GAvPeiF6kLzFqpz0Q-1; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:51:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CKIX6GAvPeiF6kLzFqpz0Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: CKIX6GAvPeiF6kLzFqpz0Q_1751287866 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D6061800287; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg3.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.33.80]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57A451956095; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 12:50:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Andrii Nakryiko , Indu Bhagat , "Jose E. Marchesi" , Beau Belgrave , Jens Remus , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/14] unwind_user: x86: Deferred unwinding infrastructure In-Reply-To: <20250625225600.555017347@goodmis.org> (Steven Rostedt's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:56:00 -0400") References: <20250625225600.555017347@goodmis.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 14:50:52 +0200 Message-ID: <878ql9mlzn.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 * Steven Rostedt: > SFrames is now supported in gcc binutils and soon will also be supported > by LLVM. Is the LLVM support discussed here? [RFC] Adding SFrame support to llvm Or is there a secone effort? > I have more patches on top of this series that add perf support, ftrace > support, sframe support and the x86 fix ups (for VDSO). But each of those > patch series can be worked on independently, but they all depend on this > series (although the x86 specific patches at the end isn't necessarily > needed, at least for other architectures). Related to perf support: I'm writing up the SFrame change proposal for Fedora, and I want to include testing instructions. Any idea yet what a typical =E2=80=9Cperf top=E2=80=9D or =E2=80=9Cperf report=E2=80=9D command= line would look like? Thanks, Florian