Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device()

Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03T15:43:16Z

On 06/02, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> I guess the static version above should work to remove the ifdef. And yes on top is fine.

OK, I've sent v2.

But again, I won't argue if you prefer to keep tick_do_timer_boot_cpu and add
WARN_ON_ONCE(tick_cpu != tick_do_timer_boot_cpu) before WRITE_ONCE(tick_do_timer_cpu).
In this case another patch makes no sense, I'll update this one.

Just tell me what you like more. Sorry for the chaotic emails.

Oleg.