From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 41/58] x86/apic: Add max_apic_id member
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:54:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rbdxliy.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6q1y82v.ffs@tglx>
On Tue, Jul 18 2023 at 09:47, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17 2023 at 17:19, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> So all of your patches make sense to me, but the whole apic_flat case
>> confuses me.
>>
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 16:15, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_flat_64.c
>>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static struct apic apic_flat __ro_after_
>>> .cpu_present_to_apicid = default_cpu_present_to_apicid,
>>> .phys_pkg_id = flat_phys_pkg_id,
>>>
>>> + .max_apic_id = 0xFE,
>>> .get_apic_id = flat_get_apic_id,
>>> .set_apic_id = set_apic_id,
>>
>> flat_send_IPI_mask() can only deal with a single word mask. How the
>> heck can the max apic ID be more than 64?
>>
>> I'm probably very confused.
>
> APIC is doing that to people.
>
> The confusing part here is the physical APIC ID vs. the destination
> mode.
>
> Physical APIC ID is always a unique number per CPU (APIC) and on XAPIC
> ranging from 0x0 to 0xFE. That's what is actually checked with that
> max_apic_id entry.
>
> Destination mode is a different story. APIC has two destination modes
> for actually sending IPIs or messages from IO/APIC or PCI/MSI: Physical
> and logical.
>
> Logical is a bitmap of 8 bits, where each bit represents one CPU. So the
> maximum number of CPUs addressable in logical mode is 8.
>
> You can have a system with 8 CPUs where the physical APIC IDs are
> 0x20-0x27 and use logical destination mode by setting the LDR register
> to the bit which represents the CPU, i.e. 1 << CPU#.
>
> So in that 8 CPU case LDR is 0x1, 0x2, ... 0x80 on CPU0 - 7. When
> sending an IPI then the destination mode in the ICR is set to logical
> and the destination field is written with the bit representing the
> target, i.e. 1 << CPU#. The destination field can have multiple bits set
> to send the IPI to several CPUs (up to 8) with a single ICR write
> operation.
>
> Once the machine has more than 8 CPUs we are forced to use physical
> destination mode. Physical destination mode is using the physical APIC
> ID of the target: 0-254 are the valid addresses, which fit into one
> byte. 255 (0xff) is a broadcast address. Sending IPIs to multiple
> targets needs one ICR write per target, which is obviously more
> expensive as between each write the ICR register has to be read back and
> the ICR busy bit needs to go back to zero before the next ICR write can
> happen.
>
> X2APIC is similar. It just has a wider physical APIC ID space (full
> 32bit). X2APIC has a logical destination mode too which is more
> useful. The logical destination is 32bit wide and split into two areas:
>
> [cluster ID] [logical ID]
>
> Each being 16 bit wide. The logical ID is again one bit per CPU, the
> cluster ID is a number. So we can send IPIs to multiple targets (up to
> 16) within a cluster with one ICR write. If the IPI targets are in
> different clusters then obviously we need one write per cluster.
>
> Physical destination mode on X2APIC is the same as with XAPIC but
> cheaper as it does not need the ICR readback.
Just for making the confusion complete. XAPIC has a clustered logical
mode too:
The cluster ID is in the topmost 4 bits with a range from 0-14 and the
logical ID bits are the lower 4 bits. That means it works up to 4 * 15 =
60 CPUs.
The kernel never implemented that mode and with anything modern having
X2APIC I don't think it's worth the trouble to do so.
Thanks,
tglx
---
"Confusion now hath made his masterpiece." - Shakespeare, Macbeth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-18 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 23:14 [patch 00/58] x86/apic: Decrapification and static calls Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 01/58] x86/cpu: Make identify_boot_cpu() static Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 02/58] x86/cpu: Remove unused physid_*() nonsense Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 03/58] x86/apic: Rename disable_apic Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 04/58] x86/apic/ioapic: Rename skip_ioapic_setup Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 05/58] x86/apic: Remove pointless x86_bios_cpu_apicid Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 06/58] x86/apic: Get rid of hard_smp_processor_id() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 07/58] x86/apic: Remove unused max_physical_apicid Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 08/58] x86/apic: Nuke unused apic::inquire_remote_apic() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 09/58] x86/apic: Get rid of boot_cpu_physical_apicid madness Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 10/58] x86/apic: Register boot CPU APIC early Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 11/58] x86/apic: Remove the pointless APIC version check Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 12/58] x86/of: Fix the APIC address registration Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 13/58] x86/apic: Make some APIC init functions bool Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 14/58] x86/apic: Split register_apic_address() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 15/58] x86/apic: Sanitize APIC address setup Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:14 ` [patch 16/58] x86/apic: Sanitize num_processors handling Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 17/58] x86/apic: Nuke another processor check Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 18/58] x86/apic: Remove check_phys_apicid_present() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 19/58] x86/apic: Get rid of apic_phys Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 13:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-20 4:18 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-07-20 8:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 4:17 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 20/58] x86/apic/32: Sanitize logical APIC ID handling Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 21/58] x86/apic/32: Remove x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 22/58] x86/apic/ipi: Code cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 23/58] x86/apic: Mop up early_per_cpu() abuse Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 24/58] x86/apic/32: Remove pointless default_acpi_madt_oem_check() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 4:28 ` Juergen Gross
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 25/58] x86/apic/32: Decrapify the def_bigsmp mechanism Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 26/58] x86/apic/32: Remove bigsmp_cpu_present_to_apicid() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 27/58] x86/apic: Nuke empty init_apic_ldr() callbacks Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 28/58] x86/apic: Nuke apic::apicid_to_cpu_present() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 29/58] x86/ioapic/32: Decrapify phys_id_present_map operation Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 30/58] x86/apic: Mop up *setup_apic_routing() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 31/58] x86/apic: Mop up apic::apic_id_registered() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 32/58] x86/apic/ipi: Tidy up the code and fixup comments Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 33/58] x86/apic: Consolidate wait_icr_idle() implementations Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 34/58] x86/apic: Allow apic::wait_icr_idle() to be NULL Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 35/58] x86/apic: Allow apic::safe_wait_icr_idle() " Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 36/58] x86/apic: Move safe wait_icr_idle() next to apic_mem_wait_icr_idle() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 37/58] x86/apic/uv: Get rid of wrapper callbacks Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 38/58] x86/apic/x2apic: Share all common IPI functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 39/58] x86/apic/64: Uncopypaste probing Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 40/58] x86/apic: Wrap APIC ID validation into an inline Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 41/58] x86/apic: Add max_apic_id member Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-18 7:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 15:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-07-18 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-07-18 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 42/58] x86/apic: Simplify X2APIC ID validation Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 43/58] x86/apic: Prepare x2APIC for using apic::max_apic_id Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 44/58] x86/apic: Sanitize APID ID range validation Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 45/58] x86/apic: Remove pointless NULL initializations Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 46/58] x86/apic/noop: Tidy up the code Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 47/58] x86/apic: Remove pointless arguments from [native_]eoi_write() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-23 22:45 ` Wei Liu
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 48/58] x86/apic: Nuke ack_APIC_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-23 22:45 ` Wei Liu
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 49/58] x86/apic: Wrap apic->native_eoi() into a helper Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 50/58] x86/apic: Provide common init infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 21:29 ` Peter Keresztes Schmidt
2023-07-18 21:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 51/58] x86/apic: Provide apic_update_callback() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 4:27 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 52/58] x86/apic: Replace acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update() and apic_set_eoi_cb() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-23 22:55 ` Wei Liu
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 53/58] x86/apic: Convert other overrides to apic_update_callback() Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 17:49 ` Michael Kelley (LINUX)
2023-07-23 12:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:15 ` [patch 54/58] x86/xen/apic: Mark apic __ro_after_init Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 15:31 ` Juergen Gross
2023-07-18 15:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 16:08 ` Juergen Gross
2023-07-17 23:16 ` [patch 55/58] x86/apic: Mark all hotpath APIC callback wrappers __always_inline Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:16 ` [patch 56/58] x86/apic: Wrap IPI calls into helper functions Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-17 23:16 ` [patch 57/58] x86/apic: Provide static call infrastructure for APIC callbacks Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-17 23:16 ` [patch 58/58] x86/apic: Turn on static calls Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-18 0:27 ` [patch 00/58] x86/apic: Decrapification and " Linus Torvalds
2023-07-18 9:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-18 14:29 ` Linus Walleij
2023-07-24 16:59 ` William Breathitt Gray
2023-07-20 12:43 ` Marc Gonzalez
2023-07-20 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-20 13:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-20 15:16 ` Marc Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rbdxliy.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox