From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: use smp_call_function_many() in arch_freq_prepare_all()
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:10:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rsrnwfz.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iKnyG=3MbKzYKsE92p8Qu0QHie_UmQUxJx9YmHGUhKrQA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 30 2022 at 10:05, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:02 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30 2022 at 09:51, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 8:58 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> >> which I hate with a passion because that allows *unpriviledged* user
>> >> space to inject systemwide IPIs every 10ms just to read these counters
>> >> which are providing not more than some estimate and are of no value for
>> >> the only sane use case of /proc/cpuinfo, i.e. #1 above.
>> >
>> > You do realize that before my patch, this is already happening ?
>> >
>> > My "optimization" simply replace an open loop of individual IPI with
>> > use of the broadcast IPI capability.
>> >
>> > Are you saying we should remove IPI broadcast and use loops
>> > of IPI, one cpu at a time ?
>>
>> I rather have no IPIs at all...
>
> Can you send an actual patch, with a changelog then ?
I can polish up the patch I sent, split it up and add changelogs. Sure.
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-30 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-11 1:17 [PATCH] x86/cpu: use smp_call_function_many() in arch_freq_prepare_all() Eric Dumazet
2022-03-11 16:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-11 16:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-23 16:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-30 15:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-30 16:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-30 17:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-30 17:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-30 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-03-30 18:10 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rsrnwfz.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox