From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 20:33:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rxdl55u.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211029082730.6728-1-yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
Rei,
On Fri, Oct 29 2021 at 17:27, Rei Yamamoto wrote:
Cc'ing a few people who worked on this code.
> If cpus on a node are offline at boot time, there are
> difference in the number of nodes between when building affinity
> masks for present cpus and when building affinity masks for possible
> cpus. This patch fixes 2 problems caused by the difference of the
> number of nodes:
>
> - If some unused vectors remain after building masks for present cpus,
> remained vectors are assigned for building masks for possible cpus.
> Therefore "numvecs <= nodes" condition must be
> "vecs_to_assign <= nodes_to_assign". Fix this problem by making this
> condition appropriate.
>
> - The routine of "numvecs <= nodes" condition can overwrite bits of
> masks for present cpus in building masks for possible cpus. Fix this
> problem by making CPU bits, which is not target, not changing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rei Yamamoto <yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/irq/affinity.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> index f7ff8919dc9b..1cdf89e5e2fb 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
> @@ -267,10 +267,16 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(unsigned int startvec,
> * If the number of nodes in the mask is greater than or equal the
> * number of vectors we just spread the vectors across the nodes.
> */
> - if (numvecs <= nodes) {
> + if (numvecs - (curvec - firstvec) <= nodes) {
> for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
> + unsigned int ncpus;
> +
> + cpumask_and(nmsk, cpu_mask, node_to_cpumask[n]);
> + ncpus = cpumask_weight(nmsk);
> + if (!ncpus)
> + continue;
> cpumask_or(&masks[curvec].mask, &masks[curvec].mask,
> - node_to_cpumask[n]);
> + nmsk);
> if (++curvec == last_affv)
> curvec = firstvec;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-29 8:27 [PATCH] irq: consider cpus on nodes are unbalanced Rei Yamamoto
2021-11-24 19:33 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-12-15 1:57 ` Rei Yamamoto
2021-12-15 4:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-17 2:48 ` Rei Yamamoto
2021-12-17 6:57 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-17 7:12 ` Rei Yamamoto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rxdl55u.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=yamamoto.rei@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox