From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751544AbeAaT5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:57:39 -0500 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:56587 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750829AbeAaT5h (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:57:37 -0500 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arch , Al Viro , Oleg Nesterov , Stephen Rothwell References: <87372oph61.fsf@xmission.com> <87a7wwnkce.fsf@xmission.com> <87607im26i.fsf_-_@xmission.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:57:28 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:30:58 -0800") Message-ID: <878tcdls2f.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1egyVi-0000gA-Jr;;;mid=<878tcdls2f.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=174.19.85.160;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18Z1C61og4of4R4hBUEBJvbJ/Mu/RTPXco= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 174.19.85.160 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 1.0 XMSubMetaSx_00 1+ Sexy Words * 1.2 XMSubMetaSxObfu_03 Obfuscated Sexy Noun-People X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa04 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 200 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.9 (2.0%), b_tie_ro: 2.6 (1.3%), parse: 1.39 (0.7%), extract_message_metadata: 20 (10.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.67 (0.8%), tests_pri_-1000: 12 (6.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.80 (0.9%), tests_pri_-900: 1.40 (0.7%), tests_pri_-400: 23 (11.4%), check_bayes: 21 (10.7%), b_tokenize: 8 (4.0%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (2.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.5 (1.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.8 (1.4%), b_finish: 0.75 (0.4%), tests_pri_0: 124 (61.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.58 (0.3%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.1 (1.5%), tests_pri_500: 9 (4.4%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] siginfo fix for 4.16-rc1 X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Eric W. Biederman > wrote: >> >> I had a brain fart when I received Stephen email about a compile failure >> in linux-next. I thought the powerpc call to memory_failure had not >> merged yet. Instead it simply failed to compile :( >> >> Linus can you please pull Stephen's fix so that powerpc builds correctly. > > I fixed this up in the merge already, afaik. Or is there some other failure? My bad. I missed you fixed it in the merge. I received a kbuild failure against linux-next this morning, and I realized the build failure was against code that was already in 2.15 so I should have patched and fixed that myself. At which point I assumed the failure was because my siginfo code had been merged into your tree. Looking again you definitely fixed this in the merge. So I don't know the story of the broken kbuild of linux-next. But I assume it will sort itself out when the dust clears. Apologies for the noise, Eric