From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751407AbdAPKbV (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:31:21 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:36430 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751226AbdAPKbT (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:31:19 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,238,1477983600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="49285908" From: Felipe Balbi To: John Stultz , lkml Cc: John Stultz , Wei Xu , Guodong Xu , Amit Pundir , Rob Herring , John Youn , Douglas Anderson , Chen Yu , Vardan Mikayelyan , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board In-Reply-To: <1481952713-29829-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> References: <1481952713-29829-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:29:16 +0200 Message-ID: <878tqbnvr7.fsf@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, John Stultz writes: > I just wanted to re-send my current queue of patches for dwc2 > controller on the HiKey board, as my last patchset ended up > colliding with a number of changes that landed in the 4.10-rc > merge window.=20 > > I've fixed things up and validated these against HiKey. I also > made a small change to one of the patches as suggested by Vardan. > > This does exclude my patchset[1] to add extcon support to dwc2, > which John Youn suspects a pending rework of the dwc2 fifo init > logic might make unnecssary (however, no such changes appeared > to have landed in 4.10-rc, so I'm still using that patchset in > my testing). > > I'm also out for the holidays after today, and while I suspect > others are likely going to be out as well, I figured I'd send > these out for a chance at review, rather then sit on them for > two weeks. I'll resend after the new year addressing any > feedback I do get though. > > Feedback would be greatly appreciated! John Y, any comments? =2D-=20 balbi --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEElLzh7wn96CXwjh2IzL64meEamQYFAlh8oHwACgkQzL64meEa mQb3bhAA3a8X90DgbpBPlrFpVKus5jRXVleVPFrqSUx/s0q4EA/yBJpkjtUI0qYE xgYs/oSovdQfiJbg92FXymzi9U8KBszpfRw+skK4W6tRD1GhjoUmCbw2dwOUcIaT PLnE3Frubfw1wv6ciyHb+tMUQCYO7ia+KaPRIvMNxaXXPZzgqbLFbJWuSfI8rhTS uomhUHHpa8Udeb0ryQScFrDo2jb5mUPBzGcEx8MZXshzx4yx6oKhcM2n9wp/bhzj 1iCkJjAWjDwPtiUyo3hqgGyCYTXquLDCAUiNd6KHu70aFAooXG9jELv9sIxBy/Ou xeShL9sdcoSzA2w/zYGRt/GRViHoVSMjmvBDehO58cvvKL4b+N9XaefzIbjqD/dk gpROU3wyyZSBHrvdNpRocYh5+ekUacnjUZ7nAReeAzgn4m+/jcMN54ZDdEQHpSAF a+K1wlziRaiQUbXtjgQki+bk1WAuVxdVBww/uPtAVLIdjZcywZZBaMhisnBolZYs ltN3JKNm5aDJ4wcgIhCI4Lz5LCVkbnUhLasvVdlrTpw2VnoWysS0J2EFeLuaXgHe R7uJPoOixaPY5dDcrZM1Np+PDHuknMrK+Ks6cyr13MeP2Ba4WAndq8A7wdploVUu HS8EQ6kb1bKS9b2OjBZK3Bvj+ykyTopIcfOtIaX3RTYj4vwc6YM= =ktYZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--