Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] usb:dwc3: pass arch data to xhci-hcd child

[Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2018 bytes --]

santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> writes:
> On 4/3/2016 11:28 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> santosh shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> writes:
>>> +Arnd, RMK,
>>>
>>> On 4/1/2016 4:57 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
>>>>> On 04/01/2016 01:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> commit 7ace8fc8219e4cbbfd5b4790390d9a01a2541cdf
>>>>> Author: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
>>>>> Date:   Mon Jul 13 18:10:05 2015 +0900
>>>>>
>>>>>       usb: gadget: udc: core: Fix argument of dma_map_single for IOMMU
>>>>>
>>>>>       The dma_map_single and dma_unmap_single should set "gadget->dev.parent"
>>>>>       instead of "&gadget->dev" in the first argument because the parent has
>>>>>       a udc controller's device pointer.
>>>>>       Otherwise, iommu functions are not called in ARM environment.
>>>>>
>>>>>       Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
>>>>>       Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Above actually means that DMA configuration code can be dropped from
>>>>> usb_add_gadget_udc_release() completely. Right?:
>>>>
>>>> true, but now I'm not sure what's better: copy all necessary bits from
>>>> parent or just pass the parent device to all DMA API.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody to shed a light here ?
>>>>
>>> The expectation is drivers should pass the proper dev pointers and let
>>> core DMA code deal with it since it knows the per device dma properties.
>>
>> okay, so how do you get proper DMA pointers with something like this:
>>
>> 	kdwc3_dma_mask = dma_get_mask(dev);
>> 	dev->dma_mask = &kdwc3_dma_mask;
>>
>> This doesn't anything.
>>
> Drivers actually needs to touch dma_mask(s) only if the core DMA
> code hasn't populated it it.

that's fair, but when driver _do_ touch it, I'd rather it be useful ;-)

> I see Grygorii pointed out couple of things already.

yeah

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]