From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Sebastian Wankerl <sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com>,
i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:44:45 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v4tbqve.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130406104053.GA24710@yoda.lan>
Philip Kranz <philip.kranz@googlemail.com> writes:
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:07:15PM +0200, James Bottomley wrote:
>> Just so you know: this isn't a parisc specific problem. Gcc produces
>> duplicate section names under various circumstances, but the one that
>> bites us is -ffunction-sections. Note that there are proposals to use
>> -ffunction-sections on all architectures (so we can garbage collect
>> unused functions) in which case you'll induce the bug identified in
>> 35dead4235e2b67da7275b4122fed37099c2f462 on every architecture
>
> I am not able to produce an object file with duplicate section names
> using gcc on x86. Even with -ffunction-sections, every section gets a
> unique name. Is this architecture-specific behaviour of gcc?
Good point. ld -r will collapse them into the same section (since gcc
produces them they have to have the same section attributes).
You can do it with --unique, but no arch uses that. PARISC has a
platform-specific toolchain hack which does that for .text sections.
(Thanks to Alan Modra for that clue...)
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-03 13:08 [PATCH] Add non-zero module sections to sysfs Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-04 1:00 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-04 9:40 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 4:00 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-05 9:40 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-05 10:07 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 4:52 ` Rusty Russell
2013-04-06 10:52 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-06 15:16 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-07 1:22 ` James Bottomley
2013-04-07 1:45 ` John David Anglin
2013-04-06 10:40 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-08 4:14 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-04-08 11:55 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-11 14:11 ` Philip Kranz
2013-04-05 14:56 ` Sebastian Wankerl
2013-04-06 4:31 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878v4tbqve.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=i4passt@lists.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=philip.kranz@googlemail.com \
--cc=sisewank@cip.cs.fau.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox