From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: omap2+: set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for INTC interrupts.
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:39:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878vhi9qj8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120425030524.7832.52047.stgit@notabene.brown> (NeilBrown's message of "Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:05:24 +1000")
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> writes:
> All interrupts can wake-from-sleep (I think) so it should be
> permissible to call enable_irq_wake(). Setting this flag allows that.
>
> It is needed because without this, an interrupt which is delivered
> during late suspend will get ignored but will not cause suspend to
> abort.
> If enable_irq_wake() is called and succeeds, check_wakuep_irqs()
> will abort the suspend if the interrupt has fired.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
The name of this flag and the effect of setting it are somewhat
confusing (e.g. why does skipping set_wake suddenly make wakeups work.)
So I tried to make it clearer with a reworking of the changelog (below.)
If I understood this correctly, and if you're OK with the updated
changelog, I'll queue this up for v3.5.
Thanks,
Kevin
>From 644742ddae59731bc10aacde94645d7c49ca5ecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:05:24 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap2+: set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for INTC interrupts.
Without an ->irq_set_wake() method in an irq_chip, calls to
enable_irq_wake() will fail. This also causes these interrupts to not
be able to abort suspend (via check_wakeup_irqs() in late suspend.)
Currently, we don't implement ->irq_set_wake() for INTC interrupts
because they default to be wakeup enabled by setting the GRPSEL bits
in PM init. Even though there is no ->irq_set_wake(), we want
enable_irq_wake() to succeed so these interrupts can abort suspend
when necessary.
To fix, set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag for all the INTC
interrupts which avoids trying to check irq_chip->irq_set_wake()
and failing when it doesn't exist.
Longer term, we need to implement ->irq_set_wake() for the INTC
which can manage the appropriate GRPSEL bits.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
[khilman@ti.com: rework changelog]
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
index 65f0d257..b0790a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ omap_alloc_gc(void __iomem *base, unsigned int irq_start, unsigned int num)
ct->chip.irq_ack = omap_mask_ack_irq;
ct->chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
ct->chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg;
+ ct->chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
ct->regs.ack = INTC_CONTROL;
ct->regs.enable = INTC_MIR_CLEAR0;
--
1.7.9.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-26 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 3:05 [PATCH 0/3] Ensure twl4030 interrupts are lost during suspend NeilBrown
2012-04-25 3:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] IRQ: allow check_wakeup_irqs to notice level-triggered interrupts NeilBrown
2012-04-25 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-25 9:39 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-25 12:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-25 21:04 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-04 5:12 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-04 16:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-08 20:52 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-25 3:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] twl4030: enable wakeup on twl4030 IRQ NeilBrown
2012-04-26 20:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-09 16:03 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-04-25 3:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: omap2+: set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for INTC interrupts NeilBrown
2012-04-26 20:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-26 20:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-26 20:39 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-26 20:50 ` NeilBrown
2012-04-27 22:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 6:20 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878vhi9qj8.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox