From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752610Ab1LSNIs (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:08:48 -0500 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:35185 "EHLO e28smtp08.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752346Ab1LSNIq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:08:46 -0500 From: Nikunj A Dadhania To: Avi Kivity Cc: Ingo Molnar , peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS In-Reply-To: <4EEF3317.6020304@redhat.com> References: <20111219083141.32311.9429.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <20111219112326.GA15090@elte.hu> <4EEF2382.4010605@redhat.com> <87hb0wbx0p.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <4EEF2729.6080501@redhat.com> <87ehw0bw9v.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <4EEF3317.6020304@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+70~gf0e0053 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:39:58 +0530 Message-ID: <878vm8btcp.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii x-cbid: 11121913-2000-0000-0000-000005C1C116 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:50:31 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/19/2011 02:06 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: > > The above ebizzy result is from a non-PLE machine, will yield_to come > > in to picture here? > > No. I have a soft-PLE patchset but I don't think it's any good. > I had tried your soft-PLE patchset some time back, gang sched was doing pretty good compared to soft-PLE. Regards, Nikunj