From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:31:31 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878vnab85w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321314197-5265-2-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:43:13 +0200, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>
> Add a flexible mechanism to specify virtio configuration layout, using
> pci vendor-specific capability. A separate capability is used for each
> of common, device specific and data-path accesses.
OK, a couple of minor suggestions:
> +static int virtio_pci_iomap(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev)
> +{
> + vp_dev->isr_map = virtio_pci_map_cfg(vp_dev,
> + VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_ISR_CFG,
> + sizeof(u8));
> + vp_dev->notify_map = virtio_pci_map_cfg(vp_dev,
> + VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_NOTIFY_CFG,
> + sizeof(u16));
> + vp_dev->common_map = virtio_pci_map_cfg(vp_dev,
> + VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG,
> + sizeof(u32));
> + vp_dev->device_map = virtio_pci_map_cfg(vp_dev,
> + VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_DEVICE_CFG,
> + sizeof(u8));
> +
> + if (!vp_dev->notify_map || !vp_dev->common_map ||
> + !vp_dev->device_map) {
> + /*
> + * If not all capabilities present, map legacy PIO.
> + * Legacy access is at BAR 0. We never need to map
> + * more than 256 bytes there, since legacy config space
> + * used PIO which has this size limit.
> + * */
> + vp_dev->legacy_map = pci_iomap(vp_dev->pci_dev, 0, 256);
> + if (!vp_dev->legacy_map) {
> + dev_err(&vp_dev->vdev.dev, "Unable to map legacy PIO");
> + goto err;
> + }
> + }
Please don't mix the two. Ever, under any circumstances. If it helps,
put CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY #ifdefs in there:
vp_dev->common_map = virtio_pci_map_cfg(vp_dev,
VIRTIO_PCI_CAP_COMMON_CFG,
sizeof(u32));
/* Something horribly wrong? */
if (IS_ERR(vp_dev->common_map)) {
err = PTR_ERR(vp_dev->common_map);
goto fail;
}
/* Not found? */
if (!vp_dev->common_map)
return legacy_setup(vp_dev, ...);
...
Practice has shown that if we allow something, it'll be done. We should
break horribly on malformed devices, and really really only fall back
when we have a well-formed, but old, device.
And various other legacy paths can happily use:
#ifdef CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY
#define is_legacy(vp_dev) ((vp_dev)->legacy_map != NULL)
#else
#define is_legacy(vp_dev) false
#endif
Here's suggested Kconfig entry:
config VIRTIO_PCI_LEGACY
bool
default y
depends on VIRTIO_PCI
---help---
Look out into your driveway. Do you have a flying car? If
so, you can happily disable this option and virtio will not
break. Otherwise, leave it set. Unless you're testing what
life will be like in The Future.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-21 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 18:18 [PATCHv2 RFC] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-14 23:43 ` [RFC 0/5] virtio-pci,kvm tools: Support new virtio-pci spec in kvm tools Sasha Levin
2011-11-14 23:43 ` [RFC 1/5] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout Sasha Levin
2011-11-21 1:01 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2011-11-14 23:43 ` [RFC 2/5] virtio-pci: Fix compilation issue Sasha Levin
2011-11-14 23:43 ` [RFC 3/5] iomap: Don't ignore offset Sasha Levin
2011-11-14 23:43 ` [RFC 4/5] kvm tools: Free up the MSI-X PBA BAR Sasha Levin
2011-11-14 23:43 ` [RFC 5/5] kvm tools: Support new virtio-pci configuration layout Sasha Levin
2011-11-15 12:59 ` [RFC 0/5] virtio-pci,kvm tools: Support new virtio-pci spec in kvm tools Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-05 19:16 ` [PATCHv2 RFC] virtio-pci: flexible configuration layout Jesse Barnes
2011-12-05 20:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878vnab85w.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox