From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [GIT PULL] task_work fix for 5.11
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 11:15:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a18f00-8f32-edcc-4595-da70e623febc@kernel.dk> (raw)
Hi Linus,
The TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL change inadvertently removed the unconditional
task_work run we had in get_signal(). This caused a regression for some
setups, since we're relying on eg ____fput() being run to close and
release, for example, a pipe and wake the other end. For 5.11, I prefer
the simple solution of just reinstating the unconditional run, even if
it conceptually doesn't make much sense - if you need that kind of
guarantee, you should be using TWA_SIGNAL instead of TWA_NOTIFY. But
it's the trivial fix for 5.11, and would ensure that other potential
gotchas/assumptions for task_work don't regress for 5.11.
we're looking into further simplifying the task_work notifications for
5.12 which would resolve that too.
Please pull!
The following changes since commit e71ba9452f0b5b2e8dc8aa5445198cd9214a6a62:
Linux 5.11-rc2 (2021-01-03 15:55:30 -0800)
are available in the Git repository at:
git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block.git tags/task_work-2021-01-19
for you to fetch changes up to 35d0b389f3b23439ad15b610d6e43fc72fc75779:
task_work: unconditionally run task_work from get_signal() (2021-01-08 09:14:21 -0700)
----------------------------------------------------------------
task_work-2021-01-19
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jens Axboe (1):
task_work: unconditionally run task_work from get_signal()
kernel/signal.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--
Jens Axboe
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 18:15 Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-01-20 4:50 ` [GIT PULL] task_work fix for 5.11 pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a18f00-8f32-edcc-4595-da70e623febc@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox