From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F65F20B80B; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784572456; cv=none; b=KAhXNYbLvwYjtXPkO4Gfx4zknxlKD0DTfT6CAhKoXjbXFTxZom464Oosc0f09mBS4v9q+9tnkjTAE9tV7dwnEa/3wyo9pdOt59kzKz6MyUNXoPllGw4ZHBMjaTcajjxJMjV0O4f1H+3+O2sIXuKaHA354ScylvOBSb4pKBeQHfE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784572456; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NO26Ob8021nMY2Vx+t069XdRFhZcaw/zqoiXCO6QM4c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aQDJeCjZgex4besT7RZfC10jUzs26ZHzLZdgEcPpbL7QuCCjvPAKd4qDOvm1FfnN738eHErl2bfwVkezZ33GaS2QiSthBN3d3eWz1zYERmYYg2qFpMBErzkylwHQ93grs0YTgxxbKP9mUuorqmxWHl5thDDSbyL9jrHdxCR8zAQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MMnOUPxd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MMnOUPxd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F3341F000E9; Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:34:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784572455; bh=ZMznXognN6jY2O/6B40bWhwyjChnNEa4hJY3YWsHU04=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=MMnOUPxd+tSBSo5Ub06jWpINU1HA22b/gi6HBz0+dWhh47agujpF9qTw4JXXqhYR4 fHqL8v2s4x7ucxzFBnkYQf7TE5wAHjW0684r1OJxdtte76iuiOYAI4+B9Lkw/vtjov PtT4VGUwXsQ7MF6E/lHQTpB+SsRSsjFMZX9FHVLP9BegeEmiJfuEHUe6rvSQiYts2N HljbTvoZVLWj/LE7uR+jZkixZHQ1i1ghtYzksRhO+aE0pTtyXSMv0XJrbdhhgSvz2A 4XuBTfr+MnkCnxHgqOx1UrQZsyyAJi0GWBIXTDgdqZm6X/Sa8RSqIFpC7c7MFl2eam AheBfOFp7yjzg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jinjie Ruan , peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel test robot , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Sven Schnelle Subject: Re: [PATCH] entry: Provide stub for syscall_enter_audit() when auditing is disabled In-Reply-To: <87cxwhn09i.ffs@fw13> References: <20260720094921.537716-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <87cxwhn09i.ffs@fw13> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:34:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87a4rlmrx8.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Jul 20 2026 at 17:34, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20 2026 at 17:49, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > The .config in the report builds without problems with s390-linux-gcc > 15.2.0 (I verified that before merging), but fails with the version used > by the robot: > > compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.4.0 > > So that's a broken compiler and without understanding the actual root > cause we are not going to paper over it. What's even more amazing is that the same config modified for x86/64 builds just fine with gcc 13.4.0, while one would assume that the decision to uninline a basically empty inline would happen before the architecture specific backend is invoked. But what do I know. :)