From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3E226E71E for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782291871; cv=none; b=rZr7hL95ZDXoJGwU9RK47LKkdNZuMtfMTCxcFH+9gG2lYQnWstvqJJ5/03ODIPNjQDq7F9JwvVbII22yfSS/LCDrny/3TliysUjdJ3xl4vspNBfR1KHXXiwAXM1O0OpLxp6YcgAcDIqFhcfrKj2ZJ4ZjhiBU/XiUijUje/xotYU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782291871; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dgnYObSwg5AGkx6KPkTsobu/ERRzPL3DC83TEPjA2yo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=F1r691RT7bCLMVVfjnG6IUJzbAd1gaY+oA1q9Z6qyFOocKXP+tT6PwA24A1fjcNVeTS87aTr2JdREdJlTBmkV5ByqLs5Lc8fVnq9UA3S08pNoKnO/IuTDYgKEFSh4Jp7oWKuuUOUvo4kJVYXKvw7nctpPdm0iWvfPjOAPIuvn4w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RyfmdGNn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RyfmdGNn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56F821F000E9; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:04:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782291870; bh=SAv5Nwt11N0EalsL0C84O2qTjUuRBlaAmNEExmi/G0c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=RyfmdGNnI1pIc50wcs4eVvoyo5eHf4OgJF7VfUtNMy8eSs0WawyZeZ6XPHkmQCWGy +QnRU3I0g6tlJ2T2a/CffaCl8tTX+qVq3AOksa6asgcwcT9WRulnUk5fqhczT6TiX2 PKD7kmpVhOnfuDOf+pxhZaFneSpRpYK9m7iEzBOZ0tjdho6oxX45r3yuS2zZjyP/c8 bjbANhDNWVKx85T6AOMm2vHqksRCbGTQeMyeyYAWn3SMB5RLkd/IkQjF/VH9lYYgaK rO8RcMH1USe94x39pHgX1At9Pee28pFVnpjbfMO8ccoOje8+3cMWqRyZP2BMr7YDk3 +HZOUSVMkdGYA== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Feng Tang , "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" Cc: Andrew Morton , Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , paulmck@kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , Peter Zijlstra , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel: add a simple timer based software watchpoint In-Reply-To: References: <20260622081430.37557-1-feng.tang@linux.alibaba.com> <0c39c459-306f-49f5-b08e-e7b9b27b6352@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:04:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87a4skl36t.ffs@fw13> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, Jun 23 2026 at 16:26, Feng Tang wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 04:13:37PM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > As discussed in RFC patch review, this debug feature is similar to > soft/hard lockup detector and task-hung detector, should I make the control How is this very specialized ad hoc debug magic in any way similar to generally useful and just working debug mechanism like the lockup or hung detector? Those are just turned on, do not need a boatload of command line parameters and are generally useful. Your debug magic is a workaround for a disfunctional hardware debugger, which means it's going to be used by three people twice a year if at all. Seriously? Thanks, tglx